The value of 3D printing model combined PCNL in kidney stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Guo Y Ai,Zhen Zhou,Zhicong Huang,Jian Zhong,Shusheng Liu,Weijie Liu,Xuliang Pang,Wei Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05720-3
Abstract:Introduction: With the continuous advancement of medical imaging, 3D printing technology is emerging. This technology allows for the representation of complex objects in a model form. This research aims to delve into the irreplaceable value of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in conjunction with 3D printed models in urinary stone surgery. This forward-looking approach provides doctors with a new perspective, enabling them to plan and execute surgeries with greater precision, ultimately delivering a safer and more efficient treatment experience for patients. We evaluated the literature on PCNL for the kidney stones with the introduction of 3D printing models and conducted a meta-analysis. The assessed parameters included stone clearance rate, operation time, hospital stay, blood loss, puncture accuracy, and the rate of complications. Evidence acquisition: We systematically searched the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, SCIE, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Search databases for articles related to PCNL (Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy) with 3D printing models from January 2000 to January 2023. Data were managed and screened using Excel . Meta-analysis was performed for operation time, stone clearance rate, blood loss, puncture accuracy, length of hospital stay, and complications in PCNL combined with 3D printing model for kidney stone treatment. The quality of included articles was assessed using the risk of bias tool by the Cochrane Collaboration. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the reliability of the results. Data were recorded using StataSE 17 software, and publication bias was examined using Egger's linear regression test. Evidence synthesis: We followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to conduct a systematic search and screening of literature relevant to the use of 3D printed models in the treatment of kidney stones. We conducted an extensive literature search across several major academic databases, including EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, SCIE, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Search databases, to ensure comprehensive coverage of relevant studies. Following the PRISMA process of screening and analysis, we ultimately included 10 randomized controlled trials with a combined sample of 608 for systematic review. Conclusions: Across these studies, we identified the introduction of 3D printing models prior to surgery for kidney stones resulted in significant advantages for the experimental group compared to the control group in terms of operation time, stone clearance rates, puncture accuracy, hospital stay, blood loss, and the incidence of complications, providing valuable insights for further research and clinical practice.