Abstract:Background. The existing literature has focused on learner perceptions or beliefs about peer review tasks over the recent decade. However, little has been known about the relationships among learner beliefs about written corrective feedback (WCF), related teacher mentoring process, and learner revision practices. Purpose. We thus aimed at addressing the gap by exploring how teacher mentoring and learner WCF beliefs may inform learner revision practices in the peer-reviewed process. Methods. In this mixed-method study, we included four Chinese EFL students majoring in English as the participants and collected their WCF belief survey data. We also collected their actual practice data through PeerCeptiv, an online writing and rewriting platform. In addition, we traced the teacher mentoring practices and interviewed the participants about their beliefs and practices in the peer review and back-evaluation process. Results. Through the mixed-methods design, we reported our major findings: the student participants believed empathy and resonance was the primary advantage of peer feedback, and teacher mentoring facilitated them in understanding and performing the peer review and revision tasks; we also found the student review process consisted of evaluating, resonating, learning, and reflecting practices and the student revision process included crediting, arguing, correcting, and polishing practices. Implications. From a sociocultural perspective, we centered our discussion on these research findings by claiming that scaffolding in different forms work together enhance learner performance and student beliefs appear in a complex manner with student actual revision practices. We also offered insights for future studies and practical implications for language teachers.

Is training student reviewers worth its while? A study of how training influences the quality of students’ feedback and writing

Comparative Study about the Impacts of Chinese Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) Feedback and Teacher Feedback on Middle School Students’ Writing Practice

Peer feedback and teacher feedback: a comparative study of revision effectiveness in writing instruction for EFL learners

Assessing the effect of giving and receiving written corrective feedback on improving L2 writing accuracy: does giving and receiving feedback have fair mutual benefit?

Feedback, feedback-on-feedback and re-feedback: effects of written dialogic peer feedback on English as a foreign language writing

Language development in writing through pair-reviews in EFL learning

Peer-to-peer dialogue about teachers’ written feedback enhances students’ understanding on how to improve writing skills

Developing Student Feedback Literacy Through Peer Review Training

Impact of automated writing evaluation on teacher feedback, student revision, and writing improvement

The effect of face-to-face versus web-based structured peer review on writing improvement: Evidence from ESP students

‘Observation has set in’: comparing students and peers as reviewers of teaching

“We learn from each other”: peer review writing practices in English for Academic Purposes

Towards Understanding Teacher Mentoring, Learner WCF Beliefs, and Learner Revision Practices Through Peer Review Feedback: A Sociocultural Perspective

The Impact Of Training Of University Teachers on their Teaching Skills, their Approach to Teaching and the Approach to Learning of their Students

To peer or not to peer: A controlled peer-editing intervention measuring writing self-efficacy in South Korean higher education

Lessons learnt from a scientific peer-review training programme designed to support research capacity and professional development in a global community

Students’ Attitudes Toward Peer Feedback: Paving a Way for Students’ English Writing Improvement

The Effectiveness of Internet-based Peer Feedback Training on Chinese EFL College Students' Writing Proficiency

Teachers' Questions and Responses during Teacher-Student Feedback Dialogues

Evaluating the Efficacy of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Writing Development among Secondary Students in Bologna, Italy

Effects of student engagement in peer feedback on writing performance in higher education