Abstract:The subject of the analysis is the relations and activities of law enforcement agencies related to the qualification of administrative offenses aimed at discrediting the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and state authorities in the context of unfriendly relations and armed confrontation between individual countries. Forces of the Russian Federation and public authorities in the conditions of unfriendly attitudes and armed confrontation of certain countries. The purpose of the study is to clarify the phenomenon of verbal and intensional offences of psycho-emotional type, the peculiarities of construction, design and deconstruction of the main elements of the composition of this type of administrative offences. Clarification of the criteria for the separation of conditionally lawful and categorically unlawful act expressed as a negative statement or aggressive unstable attitude of the psychological state of the person who committed an administrative offence also is the purpose of this paper. The research methods are based on the application of the legal text and correlation of the context of circumstances from the positions of the main provisions of propositional logic (derivation of categorical judgements about the meaning of certain terms with uncertain semantics (discrediting, publicity, targeting, etc.)). The doctrine of multiple predicates (which allowed building of matrix structures of admissibility of imputation of an unlawful act to a subject with a certain legal status only, as well as situational negation of admissibility of its imputation, if a full map of the subject's legal status is not available) is also used in the present research. Besides, design of modal constructions (rules of qualification of administrative offences of psycho-emotional type), as well as the logic of evaluations (in terms of weak and strong statements about prohibited or permissible statements about the activity of representatives of the authorities in certain conditions or in certain ways) is used as effective research method . The main conclusions of the study are expressed in the assertion of the priority establishment of amenability and punishability for offences related to the formation of destructive anti-cultural stereotypes, false ideological attitudes, belittling of the traditional way of life and denial of vital foundations of Russian society, the need to eliminate legal constructions with vague and unclear content. Increased attention should be paid to the semantic analysis and targeting of the offender's phrases precisely to replace the upheld public position with egoistic aspirations and planting the priority of personal misconceptions. It is necessary to introduce a separate category of rules of information and semantic analysis when imputing this or that administrative offence.

Issues of Demarcation of Material Elements Stipulated by Art. 322.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and Part 2 Art. 19.27 of the Administrative Offense Code of the Russian Federation

Some problems of the application of norms establishing liability for fictitious registration and fictitious registration of foreign citizens and stateless persons

Peculiarities of the legal composition of administrative offenses related to corruption

On the Language of the Special Part of the Modern Criminal Law

ISSUES OF DIFFERENTIATION OF RELATED STRUCTURES OF STEALINGS OF PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THEIR QUALIFICATION

Administrative Liability for Discrediting the Activities of Public Authorities

Features of the criminal evaluation of objective signs of timber smuggling (Art. 226.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)

Criminal legal sanctions for crimes committed by specific categories of persons

TOPICAL PROBLEMS OF QUALIFICATION OF CRIME, PROVIDING RESPONSIBILITY FOR INDECENT ASSAULT (ARTICLE 135 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION), AND MEASURES TO IMPROVE THE CRIMINAL STRUCTURE

The impact of administrative prejudice upon the content of penal prohibition

Some problems of classification of crimes committed with violence according to the Russian criminal law

Smuggling Volume as Qualifying Attribute of Constituent Elements of Crime Stipulated by Article 2001 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

Criminal law sanctions for misappropriation, embezzlement or seizure of property through abuse of office

Imposition of cumulative administrative penalty: technical-legal defects and law enforcement problems in the sphere of forest conservation

Criminal liability of individuals leading a traditional lifestyle in the Russian North for the crimes under the articles 260 and 222, 222.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

On the need to improve criminal law norms with administrative prejudice

Smuggling of Same Items Committed on Numerous Occasions as Single and Cumulative Crime

Acts of the Russian Federation Constitutional Court in the context of criminal law linkages

Criminal-legal measures of special prevention of violent encroachments and their realisation by the police at interbranch law competition

LEGISLATIVE BASIS AND JUDICIAL PRACTICE OF EXEMPTING MINORS FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY UNDER ARTICLES 90, 75, 76, 76.2 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

Approaches to the classification of other measures of criminal-legal nature aimed at countering offences, committed against the interests of the Russian Federation