Abstract:Repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) occurs through multiple distinct repair pathways including canonical and microhomology-mediated/Pol Q-dependent end joining (c-NHEJ and alt-NHEJ), homologous recombination (HR), and single strand annealing (SSA). Exactly how a particular DSB dictates which pathway is selected for repair, and the extent to which different DSB repair pathways cross-talk with each other is incompletely understood, but appears to be influenced by the specific type of DNA ends, the extent of DNA resection, the cell state and stage of the cell cycle, and the chromatin context around the break. To simultaneously interrogate multiple DNA DSB repair pathways in a systems-based manner at the single cell level, we built upon the pioneering DSB repair reporter systems created by the Jasin, Stark, Scharenberg and Certo labs to create several new CRISPR-based DNA DSB reporter systems that readout the repair of a single genomic DNA DSB by error-free c-NHEJ, mutagenic c- and alt-NHEJ, HR or SSA using multi-color fluorescence-based imaging and flow cytometry approaches. Using these DSB reporter systems we show that competition between short-range and long-range end resection influences the choice between repair by HR versus SSA, demonstrate accepted and novel functions for a variety of DNA damage sensors and repair proteins in NHEJ and HR, and illustrate the feasibility of using this system to interrogate the effects of patient-specific mutations in DNA repair proteins on DNA DSB repair pathway choice. Finally, we show that DNA DSBs created by topoisomerase inhibitor treatment in live but DNA-damaged tumor cells are capable of activating anti-tumor immune responses by signaling through both canonical and non-canonical DNA break sensing and response pathways. Citation Format: Alex Kruswick, Bert van de Kooij, Tiffany R. Emmons, Ganapathy Sriram, Emma D. Martin, Anjali Arvind, Haico van Attikum, Michael B. Yaffe. Using systems approaches to interrogate DNA double strand break signaling and repair for optimal tumor cell killing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: DNA Damage Repair: From Basic Science to Future Clinical Application; 2024 Jan 9-11; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(1 Suppl) nr IA015.

Systems Biology Approach Identifies the Kinase Csnk1a1 as a Regulator of the DNA Damage Response in Embryonic Stem Cells

subset of chromosome ends , leading to propagation of a DNA damage response that induces senescence or cell death (

In Vivo Functional Genomics Identifies Essentiality of Potassium Homeostasis in Medulloblastoma

Ultraviolet-Induced Apoptosis in Embryonic Stem Cells in Vitro

DNA damage in germ cells induces an innate immune response that triggers systemic stress resistance

Adrenergic DNA Damage of Embryonic Pluripotent Cells Via Β2 Receptor Signalling

A Conserved Checkpoint Pathway Mediates DNA Damage–Induced Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Arrest in C. elegans

Defective Replication Stress Response is Inherently Linked to the Cancer Stem Cell Phenotype.

Wnt signaling modulates the response to DNA damage in the wing imaginal disc by regulating the EGFR pathway

High Canonical Wnt/β-Catenin Activity Sensitizes Murine Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells to DNA Damage

DNA Damage Sensitivity Assays in Caenorhabditis elegans

Comparative analysis of basal and etoposide-induced alterations in gene expression by DNA-PKcs kinase activity

A genetic map of the response to DNA damage in human cells

Comparative gene expression in cells competent in or lacking DNA-PKcs kinase activity following etoposide exposure reveal differences in gene expression associated with histone modifications, inflammation, cell cycle regulation, Wnt signaling, and differentiation

FACS-based genome-wide CRISPR screens define key regulators of DNA damage signaling pathways

Abstract IA015: Using systems approaches to interrogate DNA double strand break signaling and repair for optimal tumor cell killing

DNA Damage Response and Cell Cycle Regulation in Pluripotent Stem Cells

Regulation of CHK1 by Mtor Contributes to the Evasion of DNA Damage Barrier of Cancer Cells

Regulators in the DNA Damage Response.

Genotoxic stress-triggered β-catenin/JDP2/PRMT5 complex facilitates reestablishing glutathione homeostasis

Cdk1 Controls Global Epigenetic Landscape in Embryonic Stem Cells.