Abstract:ProblemClerkship grades contribute to a summative assessment culture in clerkships and can therefore interfere with students' learning. For example, by focusing on summative, tiered clerkship grades, students often discount accompanying feedback that could inform future learning. This case report seeks to explore whether an assessment system intervention which eliminated tiered grades and enhanced feedback was associated with changes in student perceptions of clerkship assessment and perceptions of the clinical learning environment. Intervention: In January 2019, our institution eliminated tiered clerkship grading (honors/pass/fail) for medical students during the core clerkship year and implemented pass/fail clerkship grading along with required twice weekly, work-based assessments for formative feedback. Context: In this single institution, cross-sectional survey study, we collected data from fourth-year medical students one year after an assessment system intervention. The intervention entailed changing from honors/pass/fail to pass/fail grading in all eight core clerkships and implementing an electronic system to record twice-weekly real-time formative work-based assessments. The survey queried student perceptions on the fairness and accuracy of grading and the clinical learning environment-including whether clerkships were mastery- or performance-oriented. We compared responses from students one year after the assessment intervention to those from the class one year before the intervention. Comparisons were made using unpaired, two-tailed t-tests or chi-squared tests as appropriate with Cohen's d for effect size estimation for score differences. Content analysis was used to analyze responses from two open-ended questions about feedback and grading. Impact: Survey response rates were similar before and after intervention (76% (127/168) vs. 72% (118/163), respectively) with no between-group differences in demographics. The after-intervention group showed statistically significant increases in the following factors: "grades are transparent and fair" (Cohen's d = 0.80), "students receive useful feedback" (d = 0.51), and "resident evaluation procedures are fair" (d = 0.40). After-intervention respondents perceived the clerkship learning environment to be more mastery-oriented (d = 0.52), less performance approach-oriented (d = 0.63), and less performance avoid-oriented (d = 0.49). There were no statistical differences in the factors "attending evaluation procedures are fair," "evaluations are accurate," "evaluations are biased," or "perception of stereotype threat." Open-ended questions revealed student recommendations to improve clerkship summary narratives, burden of work-based assessment, and in-person feedback. Lessons Learned: After an assessment system change to pass/fail grading with work-based assessments, we observed moderate to large improvements in student perceptions of clerkship grading and the mastery orientation of the learning environment. Our intervention did not improve perceptions around bias in assessment in clerkships. Other medical schools may consider similar interventions to begin to address student concerns with clerkship assessment and promote a more adaptive learning environment.

The Required Written History and Physical is Alive, but Not Entirely Well, in Internal Medicine Clerkships

Determining Grades in the Internal Medicine Clerkship: Results of a National Survey of Clerkship Directors

Snapshot of Examination Usage in Emergency Medicine Clerkships

Resource utilisation patterns of third-year medical students

Medical student perceptions of assessments of clinical reasoning in a general surgery clerkship

Structures and Processes of Grading Committees in Internal Medicine Clerkships: Results of a National Survey

Teaching medical students the art of the 'write-up'

How Do Surgery Students Use Written Language to Say What They See? A Framework to Understand Medical Students' Written Evaluations of Their Teachers

Reflective Essays During Clerkship Following a Pre-clerkship Leadership Curriculum

Frontline assessors' opinions about grading committees in a medicine clerkship

Moving toward Mastery: Changes in Student Perceptions of Clerkship Assessment with Pass/Fail Grading and Enhanced Feedback

Writing-skills development in the health professions

Are Pre-clerkship Remediation, Grading, and Reporting Practices Equitable in the U.S.? A National Survey

Clinical Clerkships in General Medicine Enable Students to Acquire Basic Medical Competencies and Experience in Community-Based Integrated Care: A Descriptive Questionnaire-Based Study

Using Group History-Taking and Individual Reasoning to Identify Shortcomings in Clinical Reasoning for Medical Students

The Impact of Internal Medicine Clerkship Characteristics and NBME Subject Exams on USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge Exam Performance

How Medical Students Apply Their Biomedical Science Knowledge to Patient Care in the Family Medicine Clerkship

Does the Concept of the “Flipped Classroom” Extend to the Emergency Medicine Clinical Clerkship?

A case for written examinations in undergraduate medical education: experiences with modified essay examinations

Effect of Curriculum Changes on Student Performance During General Surgical Clerkship

Clerkship Grading and the U.S. Economy: What Medical Education Can Learn From America's Economic History