Abstract:Objectives Naturally exfoliated primary teeth are being increasingly collected in child development studies. Most of these odontological collections and tooth biobanks use parent‐reported information from questionnaires or tooth checklists to collect data on offspring teeth. To the best of the authors' knowledge, no studies have assessed parental engagement in tooth checklists, nor parental accuracy in identifying their child's baby tooth. This study aimed to evaluate these dimensions by analysing data from the about this tooth checklist returned with donated primary teeth in a natural experimental study called STRONG (the Stories Teeth Record of Newborn Growth). Methods Parental self‐reported information were analysed on checklists returned with 825 primary teeth belonging to 199 children. The percentage of blank answers was calculated for each question. The accuracy of parents‐reported tooth identification was evaluated by comparing parental ratings to researchers' ratings. Reliability of researchers' tooth identification was first evaluated by calculating intra‐observer and inter‐observer agreements, as well as Cohen's Kappa values. The percentage of accuracy of parents' tooth identification (relative to researcher's) was then calculated, and logistic regressions were used to evaluate if time elapsed between when exfoliation occurred and the checklist was completed associated with parental accuracy in tooth identification. Results Parents returned 98.4% of the checklists and completed 74.9% to 97.7% of the questions. Excellent reliability was demonstrated for researchers' intra‐ and inter‐rater tooth identification (agreement percentages >90%; Cohen's Kappa values >.83). Moderate accuracy of parents‐reported tooth identifications was found, with parents correctly identifying 49.5% of the donated tooth. Better parental accuracies were highlighted for partial identifications (87.1% of correct jaw, 75.6% of correct tooth type, and 65.8% of correct lateralization). Logistic regressions showed the odds of correct parental identifications decreased on average by 1.8% every 30 days of distance between tooth exfoliation and checklist completion. Conclusions While parental engagement is high, parents‐reported tooth identifications have moderate accuracy, which decreases over time. High accuracy is however found for partial identifications. Parent‐reported information on the accompanying questionnaire of naturally exfoliated primary teeth collection or tooth biobanks, even when filled in a long time after exfoliation took place, should be encouraged. However, expert identifications of teeth should remain best practice.

At what age do children have the motor development to adequately brush their teeth?

Impact of manual dexterity on toothbrushing efficacy in typically developing children: A cross‐sectional study

The influence of family socioeconomic status on toothbrushing practices in Australian children

[A clinical investigation of plaque control efficacy and safety of Sonicare toothbrush in children].

The research of periodontal condition in children

Toothbrushing and School Refusal in Elementary School: A Longitudinal Study

Bedtime Oral Hygiene Behaviours, Dietary Habits and Children’s Dental Health

Caries Increment over 2 Years in Preschool Children: A Life Course Approach

Evaluation of a parent-designed programme to support tooth brushing of infants and young children

Tooth Brushing Learning Methods: Differential or Conventional? A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Early Life Factors and Dental Caries in 5-Year-old Children in China.

DIFFERENCES IN HYGIENE INDEX OF BRUSHING TEETH WITH HORIZONTAL, ROLL AND FONE'S METHOD IN CHILDREN AGED 9-12 YEARS

Screening for Systemic Diseases Associated with Dental Self-Care in Japanese Adolescents

Tooth brushing time table media as an effort to increase the independence of brushing teeth in preschool children

Investigation and analysis of oral habits of children with dental caries

[Effect of Children's Oral Health Cognition and Behavior on Oral Health Status].

Validation of an improved questionnaire assessing the social cognitive constructs of the Health Action Process Approach among parents regarding brushing their children's teeth

How well do parents identify their child's baby teeth? Engagement and accuracy of parent‐reported information on a tooth checklist survey

Dental Age Assessment in 7-14-year-old Chinese Children: Comparison of Demirjian and Willems Methods.

Analysis Of Forecasting Indexes For Dental Caries In 3-To 6-Year-Old Children

Does poor oral health impact on young children's development? A rapid review