Key Factors Affecting Herbivore Habitat Selection in Tropicalseagrass Beds
HE JiaLu,JIANG ZhiJian,CUI LiJun,WU YunChao,LIU SongLin,LI JinLong,LI LingLan,FANG Yang,HUANG XiaoPing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1360/ssv-2020-0365
2021-01-01
Scientia Sinica Vitae
Abstract:Seagrass beds are highly productive ecosystems that provide habitat and food sources for fishes and invertebrates. Herbivores are the critical link between primary producers and secondary consumers and maintain the biodiversity and complexity of food web structures in seagrass beds. Herbivore habitat selection in different seagrass habitats is influenced by food source composition, predation risks, and other factors; however, research is needed to better understand how habitat selection influences the biodiversity maintenance mechanism in seagrass beds. In this study, the distribution and predation rate of Cerithidea rhizophorarum, an important herbivorous sea snail found in tropical seagrass beds, was studied using field investigations and in-situ experiments. Three seagrass habitats were selected, which included the seagrass species Enhalus acoroides, Thalassia hemprichii, and Cymodocea rotundata. Dual stable isotope techniques were also used to investigate the food source composition of C. rhizophorarum. The results showed that the leaf area of E. acoroides, T. hemprichii, and C. rotundata were (124.76±19.72) cm2, (10.25±5.54) cm2, and (5.98±1.06) cm2, respectively. Leaf toughness was measured to be (1.41±0.34) N, (0.51±0.14) N, and (0.18±0.03) N, respectively, and the corresponding leaf epiphyte biomasses were (16.34±6.79) g/m2, (4.29±1.98) g/m2, and (1.93±0.68) g/m2, respectively. The distribution density of C. rhizophorarum showed a trend of E. acoroides<T. hemprichii<C. rotundata habitats, while the predation rate exhibited the opposite trend. Also, the δ13C values of E. acoroides, T. hemprichii and C. rotundata were (−8.26±0.25)‰, (−8.45±0.18)‰, and (−8.81±0.26)‰, respectively. The corresponding δ15N values were (11.11±0.18)‰, (10.98±0.87)‰, and (8.11±0.74)‰, respectively. The δ13C values of C. rhizophorarum were (−9.35±0.60)‰, (−8.84±0.35)‰, and (−8.20±0.25)‰, respectively. The δ15N values were (11.76±0.27)‰, (11.91±0.51)‰, and (11.10±0.48)‰, respectively. Based on Bayesian Mixed Model (MixSIAR) analysis, we found that the diet contribution of E. acoroides, T. hemprichii, and C. rotundata to C. rhizophorarum were 14.8%, 30.3%, and 61.8%, respectively. The diet contributions of epiphytes were 48.3%, 26.8%, and 3.1%, respectively. The contribution of macroalgae ranged consistently from 27.2% to 32.2%. The contribution of particulate organic matter and sediment organic matter was relatively small. Overall, there were significant differences in the distribution density, predation rate, and food source composition of C. rhizophorarum among the three seagrass habitats. Food accessibility and the threat from natural predators were the two key factors that affected habitat selection.