Abstract:Background: Translating research findings into service improvements for patients and/or policy changes is a key challenge for health service organizations. The Health Service Executive (HSE) in Ireland launched the Action Plan for Health Research 2019-2029, as reported by Terrés (HSE, Dublin, 2019), one of the goals of which is to maximize the impact of the research that takes place within the service to achieve improvements in patient care, services, or policy change. The purpose of this research is to review the literature on knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) and to assess the suitability of the TMFs for HSE use, selecting one or more for this purpose. The aim is to produce guidance for HSE researchers and other health services staff, validate the usability of the framework(s) with researchers, and review and implement the guidance. It was hoped that identifying a suitable methodology would provide the means to increase the uptake and application of research findings, and reduce research wastage. This paper reports on the first part of the study: the review, assessment, and selection of knowledge translation TMFs for a national health service. Methods: An interdisciplinary working group of academic experts in implementation science, research wastage, and knowledge translation, along with key representatives from research funders (Health Research Board) and HSE personnel with expertise in quality improvement and research management, undertook a three-stage review and selection process to identify a knowledge translation TMF that would be suitable and usable for HSE purposes. The process included a literature review, consensus exercise, and a final consensus workshop. The review group adopted the Theory Comparison and Selection Tool (T-CaST) developed by Birken et al. (Implement Sci 13: 143, 2018) to review knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks. Results: From 247 knowledge translation TMFs initially identified, the first stage of the review identified 18 that met the criteria of validity, applicability, relevance, usability, and ability to be operationalized in the local context. A further review by a subgroup of the working group reduced this number to 11. A whole-group review selected six of these to be reviewed at a facilitated consensus workshop, which identified three that were suitable and applicable for HSE use. These were able to be mapped onto the four components of the HSE knowledge translation process: knowledge creation, knowledge into action, transfer and exchange of knowledge, and implementation and sustainability. Conclusion: The multiplicity of knowledge translation TMFs presents a challenge for health service researchers in making decisions about the appropriate methods for disseminating their research. Building a culture that uses research knowledge and evidence is important for organizations seeking to maximize the benefits from research. Supporting researchers with guidance on how to disseminate and translate their research can increase the uptake and application of research findings. The use of robust selection criteria enabled the HSE to select relevant TMFs and develop a process for increasing the dissemination and translation of research knowledge. The guidance developed to inform and educate researchers and knowledge users is expected to increase organizational capacity to promote a culture of research knowledge and evidence use within the HSE.

The Registry of Knowledge Translation Methods and Tools: a resource to support evidence-informed public health

The effectiveness of knowledge translation strategies used in public health: a systematic review

Mobilizing Clinical Decision Support to Facilitate Knowledge Translation: a Case Study in China.

The usability and applicability of knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks for research in the context of a national health service

Evidence map of knowledge translation strategies, outcomes, facilitators and barriers in African health systems

Scoping review of toolkits as a knowledge translation strategy in health

Comparative analysis of knowledge translation of health technology assessment research between different types of research institues

Developing and refining the methods for a 'one-stop shop' for research evidence about health systems

A Knowledge Translation Strategy to Promote the Health and Social Development of Students: An Evaluation Study

Systematic review of the use of process evaluations in knowledge translation research

Increased use of knowledge translation strategies is associated with greater research impact on public health policy and practice: an analysis of trials of nutrition, physical activity, sexual health, tobacco, alcohol and substance use interventions

Knowledge translation strategies for dissemination with a focus on healthcare recipients: an overview of systematic reviews

A comprehensive monitoring and evaluation framework for evidence to policy networks

Digital Knowledge Translation Tools for Disseminating Sexual and Reproductive Health Information to Adolescents: Protocol for an Evidence Gap Map Review

Impact of an organization-wide knowledge translation strategy to support evidence-informed public health decision making

Building a knowledge translation platform in Malawi to support evidence-informed health policy

From knowledge translation theory to practice: developing an evidence to care hub in a pediatric rehabilitation setting

Review of published evidence on knowledge translation capacity, practice and support among researchers and research institutions in low- and middle-income countries

Knowledge translation in men's health research: development and delivery of content for use online

Determinants Of Knowledge Translation From Health Technology Assessment To Policy-Making In China: From The Perspective Of Researchers

Knowledge translation strategies used for sustainability of an evidence-based intervention in child health: a multimethod qualitative study