Career Assessment and The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire
J.M. Schuerger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279500300204
1995-03-01
Journal of Career Assessment
Abstract:A client taking a personality questionnaire responds to a series of self-descriptive questions. Someone has described the process as "a self-administered interview." Interpretation of the scores is based on comparison of the individual's responses with those of some general population. As I see it, using a personality questionnaire for occupational assessment is similar to the basic interpretation described above, except that the individual is being compared to one or more occupational groups in addition to the general population. The client has answered a series of questions about self in some particular circumstance: prejob, career advisement, midlife change, early retirement, college-major choice, and so forth. The counselor compares the client's scores to known occupational group profiles, sometimes with known job relatedness in mind. This article was written with such occupational interpretation in mind. The first five sections are (a) the instrument, (b) psychometrics, (c) test-taking attitude, (d) cross-cultural and gender-related findings, and (e) research base. These are followed by the meat of my presentation, sections on Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF; Cattell, Eber, & Tatsuoka, 1970) 16PF occupational profiles, relationship of 16PF factors with Holland variables, typical criterion relationships, general interpretive suggestions, and suggestions for interpreting high and low 16PF scores. I also present a brief description of relevant computer interpretations of the 16PF. Long-time users of the 16PF are accustomed to the varying terms for the 16 factors and the 5 global factors on this instrument. The names have changed from time to time. I have tried to keep my use of terminology consistent with that of the most recent version, the Fifth Edition.
psychology, applied