Abstract:INTRODUCTION Since the nineteenth century, adoption has been used in the United States to create legally recognized parent-child relationships between consenting adults.1 While adult adoption has grown in prevalence in the United States,2 some Americans are either unaware of its availability or underestimate its use in our legal system. In reality, there are several reasons why an adult would choose to adopt another adult, and the practice is not at all uncommon.3 This Comment explores adult adoption and the corresponding rights afforded to adult adoptees under the intestate succession and class gift provisions of the Uniform Probate Code ("UPC").4 The Comment assesses the advantages and disadvantages of adopting the UPC's suggested provisions and proposes a modification to the UPC that treats adult adoptees consistently in both the class gift and intestacy contexts: as natural children for transfers directly from adoptive parents but not for transfers from third parties. As discussed below, such a statutory framework is both consistent with the principles of estate law and is sound public policy. The motivations behind an adult adoption are often numerous and include the recognition of familial ties, enjoyment of employment benefits, and establishment of inheritance rights.5 For these reasons, adult adoption has been used by same-sex couples to obtain some of the rights denied to them by the unavailability of marriage.6 This Comment seeks a happy medium that ensures the protection of the important benefits that lie outside of the inheritance realm, while avoiding the potential manipulation of estate law. It concludes that adult adoption petitions should be broadly granted, with legislatures resolving intestacy and class gift issues through clear and comprehensive inheritance statutes. Part II of this Comment explores the history and rationale behind adult adoption and assesses its statutory availability across states. Part III explains the treatment of adult adoptees under UPC sections 2-155 and 2-705 and determines that while the UPC provision on class gifts is consistent with decedent intent and social policy, the intestacy provision falls short. Part IV proposes a statutory scheme that adopts the UPC class gift provision, but modifies the UPC intestacy section to limit inheritance by an adult adoptee through an adoptive parent to those situations where a parent- child relationship exists. Part IV also suggests a reciprocal beneficiary program as a way for states to allow parties to preserve inheritance rights without resorting to adult adoption. I. BACKGROUND A. History of Adoption Historically, adoption's primary uses were to perpetuate familial lineage and designate heirs to fulfill religious obligations.7 The intended beneficiary of the adoption was the adopter rather than the adoptee.8 When adoption first emerged in the United States, it was an informal process used to relieve the government of a ward and provide an economic benefit to the adoptive parents.9 The state of the adoptive home was not a consideration, and the children were often used as cheap labor.10 It was not until the nineteenth century that the primary concern in minor adoptions shifted from the adopter's potential benefits to the best interests of the child.11 Adoption did not exist under English common law and its formal acceptance and regulation in the United States has been exclusively by statute.12 In the mid-nineteenth century, general adoption legislation was introduced as part of the growing call for social welfare reform.13 While some of the enacted statutes provided for the adoption of "children,"14 several state legislatures also enacted separate provisions for the adoption of adults.15 At the same time, the broad and ambiguous language of the general adoption provisions in other states was interpreted to extend to adoptees of any age.16 B. Why Adopt an Adult? While adult adoption gained recognition at around the same time as minor adoption, the rationales for its use were (and remain) largely different. …

Under the Guardians’ Supervision

Love, Care And The Illegitimate Child In Eighteenth-Century Scotland

Over Half a Million Fathers

The Perceptions of New Zealand Lawyers and Social Workers About Children Being Adopted by Gay Couples and Lesbian Couples

Original Fathers: An Exploration into the Experiences of Birth Fathers Involved in Adoption in the Mid-20th Century

Bringing Kinship into Being: Connectedness, Donor Conception and Lesbian Parenthood

A retrospective study of New Zealand case law involving assisted reproduction technology and the social recognition of 'new' family

Relative strangers: Sibling estrangements experienced by children in out-of-home care and moving towards permanence

Adult Adoption: Intestate Succession and Class Gifts under the Uniform Probate Code

Guardians of ableist family formation: the legitimation work of Danish abortion committees in cases of termination for fetal anomaly

Accommodations of private and family life and non-traditional families: the limits of deference in cases of cross-border surrogacy before the European Court of Human Rights

The making and breaking of paternity secrets in donor insemination

Kinship Care and Child Protection in High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review

"Peculiar Finalities": Blurring the Borders between Abduction and Adoption?

Whose (germ) line is it anyway? Reproductive technologies and kinship

The Rights of the Child at Risk

Solidarity exclusions: Problematizing kinship and humanitarianism from the perspective of transnational adoption

Linking pre- and post-adoption records for research in anonymised form in a data safe haven: legal implications and support for a social licence

Out-of-Home Care, Contact Orders and Infant Mental Health: Recognising a Unique Developmental Stage in Law, Policy and Practice

Non-Parents’ Rights to Child Custody

Out of time: theorizing family in social work practice