Abstract:Introduction: Our brain continuously maps our body in space. It has been suggested that at least two main frames of reference are used to process somatosensory stimuli presented on our own body: the anatomical frame of reference (based on the somatotopic representation of our body in the somatosensory cortex) and the spatial frame of reference (where body parts are mapped in external space). Interestingly, a mismatch between somatotopic and spatial information significantly affects the processing of bodily information, as demonstrated by the "crossing hand" effect. However, it is not clear if this impairment occurs not only when the conflict between these frames of reference is determined by a static change in the body position (e.g., by crossing the hands) but also when new associations between motor and sensory responses are artificially created (e.g., by presenting feedback stimuli on a side of the body that is not involved in the movement). Methods: In the present study, 16 participants performed a temporal order judgment task before and after a congruent or incongruent visual-tactile-motor- task in virtual reality. During the VR task, participants had to move a cube using a virtual stick. In the congruent condition, the haptic feedback during the interaction with the cube was provided on the right hand (the one used to control the stick). In the incongruent condition, the haptic feedback was provided to the contralateral hand, simulating a sort of 'active' crossed feedback during the interaction. Using a psychophysical approach, the point of subjective equality (or PSE, i.e., the probability of responding left or right to the first stimulus in the sequence in 50% of the cases) and the JND (accuracy) were calculated for both conditions, before and after the VR-task. Results: After the VR task, compared to the baseline condition, the PSE shifted toward the hand that received the haptic feedback during the interaction (toward the right hand for the congruent condition and toward the left hand for the incongruent condition). Dicussion: This study demonstrated the possibility of inducing spatial biases in the processing of bodily information by modulating the sensory-motor interaction between stimuli in virtual environments (while keeping constant the actual position of the body in space).

The Mechanisms of Space-Time Association: Comparing Motor and Perceptual Contributions in Time Reproduction

Unveiling interactions of spatial-temporal information in tactile motion perception

The time course of the spatial representation of 'past' and 'future' concepts: New evidence from the STEARC effect

Identifying spatial effects in a lateralized duration estimation task

The vertical space–time association

Same principle, but different computations in representing time and space

The relationship between space and time perception: A registered replication of Casasanto and Boroditsky (2008)

Investigating the Kappa Effect Elicited Through Concurrent Visual and Tactile Stimulation

Opposing Sequential Biases in Direction and Time Reproduction: Influences of Task Relevance and Working Memory

On the interplay between time and space perception in discontinuous stimulus displays

Time and numerosity estimation in peripersonal and extrapersonal space

Serial Dependence in Timing at the Perceptual Level Being Modulated by Working Memory

Spatial tactile localization depends on sensorimotor binding: preliminary evidence from virtual reality

Spatiotemporal dynamics in understanding hand-object interactions

Interaction of Perceptual Grouping and Crossmodal Temporal Capture in Tactile Apparent-Motion

Temporal perception in visual processing as a research tool.

A spatial-attentional mechanism underlies action-related distortions of time judgment

Neural Correlates of Spatio-Temporal Grouping in Bistable Apparent Motion Perception

The neural mechanism of spatial-positional association in working memory: A fMRI study

Enhancing rhythmic temporal expectations: The dominance of auditory modality under spatial uncertainty