Abstract:Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefits of bilateral implantation for bone-anchored hearing system (BAHS) users in terms of spatial resolution abilities and auditory memory for speech. Design: This is a prospective, single-center, comparative, single-blinded study where the listeners served as their own control. Twenty-four experienced bone-anchored users with a bilateral conductive or mixed hearing loss participated in the study. After fitting the listeners unilaterally and bilaterally with BAHS sound processor(s) (Ponto 3 SuperPower), spatial resolution was estimated by measuring the minimum audible angle (MAA) to achieve an 80% correct response via a two-alternative-forced choice task (right-left discrimination of noise bursts) in two conditions: both sound processors active (bilateral condition) and only one sound processor active (unilateral condition). In addition, a memory recall test, the Sentence-final Word Identification and Recall (SWIR) test was performed with five lists of seven sentences for each of the two conditions (unilateral and bilateral). Self-reported performance in everyday life with the listener's own sound processors was also evaluated via a questionnaire (the abbreviated version of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale). Results: The MAA to discriminate noise bursts improved significantly from 75.04° in the unilateral condition to 3.61° in the bilateral condition ( p < 0.0001). The average improvement in performance was 54.28°. The SWIR test results showed that the listeners could recall, on average, 55.03% of the last words in a list of seven sentences in the unilateral condition and 57.23% in the bilateral condition. While the main effect of condition was not significant, there was a significant interaction between condition and repetition (list), revealing a significantly higher recall performance in the bilateral condition than in the unilateral condition for the second repetition/list out of five (10.2% difference; p = 0.022). Self-reported performance with bilateral BAHS obtained via the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale questionnaire was, on average, 4.4 for speech, 3.7 for spatial, and 5.1 for qualities of hearing. There was no correlation between self-reported performance in everyday life and bilateral performance in the MAA test, while significant correlations were obtained between self-reported performance and recall performance in the SWIR test. Conclusions: These results showed a large benefit in spatial resolution for users with symmetric BC thresholds when being fitted with two BAHS, although their self-reported performance with bilateral BAHS in everyday life was rather low. In addition, there was no overall benefit of bilateral fitting on memory for speech, despite observing a benefit in one out of five repetitions of the SWIR test. Performance in the SWIR test was correlated with the users' self-reported performance in everyday life, such that users with higher recall ability reported to achieve better performance in real life. These findings highlight the advantages of bilateral fitting on spatial resolution, although bilaterally fitted BAHS users continue to experience some difficulties in their daily lives, especially when locating sounds, judging distance and movement. More research is needed to support a higher penetration of bilateral BAHS treatment for bilateral conductive and mixed hearing losses.

Speech intelligibility of hearing impaired participants in long-term training of bone-conducted ultrasonic hearing aid

Research of the Hearing Aid Technique with Bone-Conducted Ultrasound

Improved Binaural Hearing Effects and Sound Source Localization in Listeners with Simulated Unilateral Conductive Hearing Loss: Effect of a Bone Conduction Device

The Effect of Short-Term Auditory Training on Speech in Noise Perception and Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Adults with Cochlear Implants

Audiometric Comparison Between the First Patients With the Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant and Matched Percutaneous Bone Anchored Hearing Device Users

Comparison on characteristics of the bone-conducted ultrasound and the bone-conducted audible sound

Evaluation of the Benefits of Bilateral Fitting in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: Spatial Resolution and Memory for Speech

Computer-based auditory phoneme discrimination training improves speech recognition in noise in experienced adult cochlear implant listeners

Binaural hearing ability with mastoid applied bilateral bone conduction stimulation in normal hearing subjects.

Effects of SoundBite Bone Conduction Hearing Aids on Speech Recognition and Quality of Life in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness

Simulation Studies For Comparison Of Bone-Conducted Ultrasound And Bone-Conducted Audible Sound

Evaluating the effectiveness of bone conduction hearing implants in rehabilitation of hearing loss

Research for Bone-Conduction Test of Profoundly Hearing Damaged Patients

Long‐Term Binaural Hearing Improvements for Cochlear Implant Users with Asymmetric Hearing Loss

The effect of percutaneous and transcutaneous BAHA on hearing and subjective auditory abilities: A comparative study

Speech in Noise With Bilateral Active Bone Conduction Implant for Conductive and Mixed Hearing Loss

Differing Bilateral Benefits for Spatial Release From Masking and Sound Localization Accuracy Using Bone Conduction Devices

Multisensory training improves auditory spatial processing following bilateral cochlear implantation

Characteristics of sound localization in children with unilateral microtia and atresia and predictors of localization improvement when using a bone conduction device

Speech Recognition and Subjective Hearing Abilities for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Users With Unilateral Hearing Loss

An Experiment Platform for Bone Conducted Ultrasound Hearing