Abstract:Active learning, including student thinking and discussion in class, has been shown to increase student learning gains. However, it is less clear how instructor-level variation in the implementation and timing of active learning activities affects student gains. Our study aims to investigate the extent to which the time spent on individual episodes of active learning activities influences student performance. We hypothesized that instructors who let students spend more time on peer discussion and individual thinking on practice problems associated with particular learning objectives would have better student exam scores on exam questions addressing those objectives. To test this hypothesis, we obtained a large data set of classroom recordings and student exam scores from an introductory biology course at a large 4-year university, where three instructors shared identical teaching materials and exams for different course offerings. Contrary to our hypothesis, although the three instructors spent significantly different amounts of time on episodes of thinking and peer discussion, there was no correlation between the total time spent on active learning activities and student performance on exam questions. Linear mixed-effects modeling of the effect of the length of episodes of student thinking and discussion on exam score found that in the context of shared instructional materials, the amount of course time spent on active learning activities did not reliably predict student performance on associated exam questions. This result held true even when only considering learning objectives with high variations in performance between offerings, difficult exam questions, or exam questions requiring higher-order thinking skills. Although our study was only conducted in one course, our results imply that time spent per individual episode of student thinking or peer discussion may not be the primary factor explaining the positive effects of active learning and that it may be worthwhile to explore other factors.

Short- and Long-Term Effects of Cumulative Finals on Student Learning

The retention benefits of cumulative versus non-cumulative midterms in introductory biology may depend on students' reasoning skills

The Effect of a Final Exam on Long-Term Retention

Retention following Two-Stage Collaborative Exams Depends on Timing and Student Performance

A four-cohort study testing the relative impact of take-home and in-class examination on students' academic performance and wellbeing

The effect of exam retakes on future exam performance in a large classroom setting

Verbal Final Exam in Introductory Biology Yields Gains in Student Content Knowledge and Longitudinal Performance

Further Evidence of Critical Thinking and Final Examination Performance in Advanced Financial Accounting

An Evaluation of Asynchronous Online Discussion Board Formats in Interteaching

Effect on Procrastination and Learning of Mistakes in the Design of the Formative and Summative Assessments: A Case Study

Optional Exam Retakes Reduce Anxiety but may Exacerbate Score Disparities Between Students with Different Social Identities

The Effects of Online Assignments and Weekly Deadlines on Student Outcomes in a Macroeconomics Course

Increased Course Structure Improves Performance in Introductory Biology

A high-impact practice for online students: the use of a first-semester seminar course to promote self-regulation, self-direction, online learning self-efficacy

Time spent on active learning activities does not necessarily correlate with student exam performance: a controlled case study

Does Lecture Style Matter in Asynchronous Online Interteaching?

Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance

The impact of lecture capture availability on academic performance in a large biomedical science course

Semester Course Load and Student Performance

Evaluation of Student Academic Performance After Curricular Content Reduction

To Grade or Not to Grade (the Quiz): The Impact of Two Formative Assessment Grading Approaches on Summative Assessment Outcomes in an Integrated Pre-clinical Curriculum