Abstract:A credit default is a negative event for individual borrowers, and lenders and at scale, can impact the broader economy. To protect against losses, lenders seek to maintain robust lending practices through optimising credit risk assessment. The credit risk modelling literature is extensive, yet many studies suffer from flaws stifling adoption by industry. Nonlinear algorithms are often incorporated for comparison purposes, nevertheless, a comprehensive explanation of variables and their treatment is not always provided. Furthermore, the publicly available data sets do not necessarily contain important financial variables and their limited sample size raises questions regarding their statistical power. Commonly the focus is on statistical performance as opposed to optimizing the commercial outcome motivating the use of credit scorecards. However, financial institutions are more interested in optimizing profits by reducing the cost arising from false assessments of credit applicants. In this research, we simulated important financial variables recommended by industry to append to German Credit Dataset to compare optimised credit risk assessment models. The performance of Logistic Regression is compared with Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Machine and Artificial Neural Network. A new financial performance metric is developed to estimate the costs arising from both false positives and false negatives, and compared with statistical criteria; Area under the Receiver Operating Curve, Accuracy and Somers' Delta. Four typical asset classes; Credit Cards, Small and Large Loans, and Mortgages are simulated to determine which algorithm outperforms in estimating costs. The results demonstrate that Artificial Neural Network outperforms other methods, and our approach ranks models differently from the purely statistical measures. The proposed cost metric would provide a significant financial benefit to organisations.

Selection bias in credit scorecard evaluation

Fighting Sampling Bias: A Framework for Training and Evaluating Credit Scoring Models

Approaches for credit scorecard calibration: An empirical analysis

A critical review of existing and new population stability testing procedures in credit risk scoring

Reject inference methods in credit scoring

The Bank Conducts Credit Evaluation on Credit Holders

Bias in Evaluation Processes: An Optimization-Based Model

Optimal Credit Scorecard Model Selection Using Costs Arising from Both False Positives and False Negatives

The Fairness of Credit Scoring Models

Discovery of Bias and Strategic Behavior in Crowdsourced Performance Assessment

On Lasso and adaptive Lasso for non-random sample in credit scoring

A First Look at Selection Bias in Preference Elicitation for Recommendation

Efficient estimation and correction of selection-induced bias with order statistics

Enhancing credit scoring accuracy with a comprehensive evaluation of alternative data

Algorithmic fairness in credit scoring

Shallow Self-Learning for Reject Inference in Credit Scoring

Risk Scores, Label Bias, and Everything but the Kitchen Sink

Credit scoring methods: Latest trends and points to consider

What can be learned from satisfaction assessments?

Selection tests work better than we think they do, and have for years

Algorithms in selection decisions: Effective, but unappreciated