Abstract:Background: The surgical outcomes of individual patient with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) can vary depending on various patient-related factors. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) is a well-developed tool for outcome measurement and considers both disease-specific and general health aspects. This study aimed to investigate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the JOACMEQ in patients with OPLL in mainland China and to compare post-operative outcomes of OPLL patients between mainland China and Japan. Methods: This multicenter trial was performed between July 2009 and June 2019. The procedure for the JOACMEQ translation followed Beaton's guidelines. All patients enrolled were diagnosed with OPLL and had completed the JOACMEQ, the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale, and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) before and after surgery. The reliability (Cronbach's a and Pearson's correlation), construct validity (factor analysis), concurrent validity (Spearman's correlation with SF-36) and responsiveness (effect sizes) of JOACMEQ were evaluated. A mixed-model analytic approach was used to analyze differences in postoperative outcomes between the 2 countries. Results: Ninety-one patients from mainland China and ninety-one patients from Japan were recruited. JOACMEQ showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's a=0.75). In test-retest reliability evaluation, except for the bladder function domain, the JOACMEQ domains had good test-retest reliability (0.89-0.96). In factor analysis, most of the items (19/24) were well clustered. Regarding clinical validity, all 5 domains were found to have moderate correlations with the physical component summary (PCS) of SF-36 (r=0.25- 0.50), and the bladder function and quality of life domains also had moderate correlations ( r=0.25- 0.50) with the mental component summary (MCS) of SF-36. JOACMEQ showed a variable responsiveness in different domains (effect size =0.17-0.84; standardized response means =0.15-0.85). Regarding postoperative improvements in the JOACMEQ score, mixed-model analysis revealed a significant difference in the quality of life domain between Chinese and Japanese patients (16.0 +/- 18.7 vs. 7.8 +/- 17.7, P<0.05). Conclusions: JOACMEQ generally shows good reliability, good validity and mild responsiveness, and can identify the post-operative improvements in patients with OPLL in mainland China. Chinese OPLL patients showed a significantly larger improvement in postoperative quality of life compared to their Japanese counterparts.

Dynamic change and influence of osteoporotic back pain with vertebral fracture on related activities and social participation: evaluating reliability and validity of a newly developed outcome measure

Factors associated with pain-related disorders and gait disturbance scores from the Japanese orthopedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index in patients with osteoporosis

Psychometric validation of the adapted Traditional Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)

Health-related quality of life in osteoporosis: a systematic review of measurement properties of the QUALEFFO-41

Quality of life as outcome in the treatment of osteoporosis: the development of a questionnaire for quality of life by the European Foundation for Osteoporosis

Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire As an Outcome Measure for Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Patients in East Asia: an Investigation of Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness

Development and Validation of Objective and Subjective Osteoporosis Knowledge Instruments among Chinese Orthopaedic Surgeons

Osteoporosis, spinal degenerative disorders, and their association with low back pain, activities of daily living, and physical performance in a general population

Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: Which has Superior Measurement Properties in Older Adults with Low Back Pain?

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire Short Version (OPAQ-SV) for Chinese Osteoporotic Fracture Females

Development of self-administered questionnaire on barriers, prescription practices, and guideline adherence of osteoporosis management among tertiary care clinicians: content validity and reliability analysis

Associations between health-related quality of life, physical function and pain in older women with osteoporosis and vertebral fracture

Development of osteoporosis quality of life scale and item selection

Correlation Between Pain, Disability, and Quality of Life in Patients With Common Low Back Pain

Health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women with low BMD with or without prevalent vertebral fractures.

Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the quality of life questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO)

Validation and Reliability of a Japanese Version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Health‐related quality of life in postmenopausal women with low BMD with or without prevalent vertebral fractures

Clinical Profiles of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Secondary Data Analysis of 358 Patients from a Prospective Clinical Study

Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): part 4. Establishment of equations for severity scores. Subcommittee on low back pain and cervical myelopathy, evaluation of the clinical outcome committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association

Validity and reliability of the Body Awareness Questionnaire in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain