Abstract:Introduction Governments around the globe now seek to judge the performance of their public services. This has given rise to the introduction of a range of complex and sophisticated regimes to provide information to politicians, managers and the public on organizational success or failures. Examples include an index of measures of performance of Chinese cities (China Daily 2004), the Comprehensive Performance Assessment in English local government (Audit Commission 2002), the Government Performance Results Act 1992 in the US, the Service Improvement Initiative in Canada, the Putting Service First scheme in Australia, Strategic Results Area Networks in New Zealand, Management by Results in Sweden, and Regulation of Performance Management and Policy Evaluation in the Netherlands (Pollitt and Bouckaert 2004). Researchers have increasingly turned their attention to public service performance (e.g., see the Symposium edition of Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2005 (Boyne and Walker 2005), on the determinants of performance in public organizations). Despite such progress, a persistent problem for public management researchers and practitioners has been the conceptualisation and measurement of performance. Previous research has shown that organizational performance is multifaceted (Boyne 2003; Carter et al . 1992; Quinn and Rohrbaugh 1983; Venkatraman and Ramanujuam 1986). This is because public organizations are required to address a range of goals, some of which may be in conflict. Consequently, public organizations are obliged to focus attention on multiple dimensions of performance. Boyne's (2002) review of these dimensions isolated five conceptual categories – outputs, efficiency, effectiveness, responsiveness and democratic outcomes.

Organizational Control Systems and Pay-for-Performance in the Public Service

“Good” and “Bad” Control in Public Administration: The Impact of Performance Evaluation Systems on Employees’ Trust in the Employer

The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance

Economics, Public Service Motivation, and Pay for Performance: Complements or Substitutes?

Public Service Performance: Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: An empirical exploration

Disentangling the Impact of Perceived Electronic Performance Monitoring on Employee Burnout in the Public Sector

Public Service Motivation and Performance: The Role of Organizational Identification

Organizational Performance and Measurement in the Public Sector: Toward Service, Effort and Accomplishment Reporting

Performance-Related Payments in Local Governments: Do They Improve Performance or Only Increase Salary?

Performance-Related Payment in the Public Sector: Theoretical Issues and Results from a Case Study of a Brazilian Government Agency

Competition, Ownership, and the Impact of Government Outsourcing on Employees

Personnel Psychology: Performance Evaluation and Pay for Performance

Does performance-related pay and public service motivation research treat state-owned enterprises like a neglected Cinderella? A systematic literature review and agenda for future research on performance effects

Performance Management Goldilocks Style: A Transaction Cost Analysis of Incentive Intensity in Performance Regimes

Teachers’ Perceptions of Individual Performance-related Pay in Practice: A Picture of a Counterproductive Pay System

Performance audit as a contributor to change and improvement in public administration

Motivating and Demotivating Effects of Performance-Related Pay in Swedish Public Sector Organizations

A Cognitive Evaluation and Equity-Based Perspective of Pay for Performance on Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis and Path Model

Does Pay-for-performance Create More Ingratiation?From the Perspective of Conservation of Resources Theory

On the road to performance governance in the public domain

Central Audit Institutions and Performance Auditing: A Comparative Analysis of Organizational Strategies in the OECD