Abstract:This review aims to stimulate new ways of thinking about how to model depression in rats and mice. The article is founded on the premise that anthropomorphic inferences should be removed entirely from research involving rodents. The application of animal models to study depression over the past 30 years has been based largely on nonempirical and hence nonscientific assumptions about psychological states that probably do not exist and certainly cannot be measured in rodents. Such assumptions may have led to the misinterpretation of some behaviors, such as decreased locomotor activity or decreased sucrose consumption, as symptoms of depression in rats. Previous research has also overemphasized the causal role of stress in depression. After reviewing major features of several commonly employed models, this article challenges traditional concepts about validity. Models are first evaluated based on the goals of the research. Screening for potential antidepressant compounds requires little or no consideration of the validity of the model. Issues of validity become more critical when attempting to study the neurobiological basis of depression. The primary importance of face validity is emphasized, and the value of various behavioral measures is assessed based on how directly they resemble discrete behavioral symptoms seen in depressed humans. A "neurobehaviorally mechanistic" approach is described. This approach relies on formulating discrete, neurobiological hypotheses to explain individual symptoms rather than to explain collections of symptoms or the entire disorder. The approach thus relies on pragmatic measures of operationally well-defined behavioral variables. The review concludes with the proposal that understanding the neurobiological basis for individual symptoms will ultimately yield a better understanding of depression.

Learned helplessness: unique features and translational value of a cognitive depression model

Animal Models of Depression: What Can They Teach Us about the Human Disease?

Assessing the relationship between the human learned helplessness depression model and anhedonia

Treatment-resistant depression: are animal models of depression fit for purpose?

Stress-based animal models of depression: Do we actually know what we are doing?

Depression: a new animal model sensitive to antidepressant treatments

Animal models of major depression: drawbacks and challenges

Animal models of depression and anxiety: What do they tell us about human condition?

Rodent Models of Depression: Reexamining Validity Without Anthropomorphic Inference

Mouse Models for Studying Depression-Like States and Antidepressant Drugs

Low cognitive competence as a vulnerability factor for behavioral despair in rats

Animal models of major depression and their clinical implications

Animal models of depression: navigating through the clinical fog

The future of rodent models in depression research

Systematic analysis of severity in a widely used cognitive depression model for mice

Rodent models of impaired fear extinction

Animal models for depression and the mismatch hypothesis of disease

Chronic unpredictable mild stress for modeling depression in rodents: Meta-analysis of model reliability

Animal models of recurrent or bipolar depression

Cognitive aspects of congenital learned helplessness and its reversal by the monoamine oxidase (MAO)-B inhibitor deprenyl