Abstract:Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) could be life saving for patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-induced severe respiratory failure not responding to optimal conventional management, including mechanical ventilation and proning.[1] However, thrombosis and/or bleeding may be major complications of patients supported with ECMO.[2] The aim of this single-center retrospective observational study in a UK ECMO center was to assess whether thrombotic or bleeding phenotypes differ in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia treated with veno-venous (VV)-ECMO compared to those who received VV-ECMO for other viral pneumonias. Mortality rate up to 120 days after VV-ECMO initiation was also assessed, as well as the factors directly contributing to death.Fifty-four consecutive COVID-19 patients supported with VV-ECMO from March 17th, 2020 to May 26th, 2020 were compared with an age and sex-comparable cohort of 43 patients with non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia from April 5th 2018 to January 19th, 2020. Of the 43 non-COVID-19 patients, the majority of them had Influenza A (38/43, 88.4%), 4.6% (2/43) had non-coronavirus disease 2019 (non-COVID-19), one patient had co-infection of parainfluenza and rhinovirus and the remaining two patients had human metapneumovirus and adenovirus, respectively. All patients had a confirmed diagnosis of viral infection from polymerase chain reaction nasopharyngeal swabs. Both cohorts were managed using the same scanning and anticoagulant protocols.[3] The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee and the local Research and Development Office (reference number: 20/EE/0160).Anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) was managed as described in our previous study.[3] Argatroban was used in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or when heparin resistance was evident.[4] All thrombotic and bleeding complications were identified on routine or clinically indicated CT or ultrasound (US) imaging. Routine whole-body CT imaging was performed in all patients within 24 hours of admission for VV-ECMO. Routine upper and lower limb compression US and/or CT venography was performed within 24 hours of ECMO decannulation. Additional imaging was performed as indicated for clinical suspicion of thrombosis or bleeding.Bleeding events were defined as major or clinically relevant minor hemorrhages according to ISTH classification.[5] [6] Diagnosis of HIT was performed as described previously[3] (appendix page 1). Anticoagulant levels and target on the day of thrombotic or bleeding events were recorded.Results are presented as percentages for categorical data, median and range for skewed continuous data, and means (95% confidence interval). Groups were compared using the Chi-square test for categorical data, and the t-test for continuous data (as appropriate). p-Values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Changes in blood results over time are presented in graphical format.Baseline characteristics of the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cohorts were comparable by age, sex, body-mass index (BMI), and co-morbidities ([Table 1]). The duration of VV-ECMO was greater in patients with COVID-19 compared to non-COVID-19: median (range) was 19 (3–57) days versus 15 (3–60) days (p = 0.02). Laboratory parameters (averaged in the first 24 hours after initiation of ECMO) are presented in [Table 1]. Platelet and neutrophil counts were higher in patients with COVID-19 compared to non-COVID-19. Median fibrinogen levels on admission were increased in both groups but were significantly higher in the COVID-19 cohort. There were no other laboratory parameter differences between groups in the 24 hours following initiation of ECMO.VariableReference rangeCOVID-19 (n = 54)Non-COVID-19 (n = 43)p-ValueAge, mean (SD)–46.3 (10.8)46.4 (10.5)0.96Gender, male–40 (74.1%)31 (72.1%)1.0BMI, mean (SD)–29.8 (6.4)30.4 (7.2)0.65Diabetes–11 (20.4%)11 (25.6%)0.61Ischemic heart disease–00–Hypertension–13 (24.1%)9 (20.9%)0.80Previous VTE–02 (4.6%)0.50Anticoagulant therapy–0/152 (4.6%)1.00Antiplatelet–12 (21.8%)7 (16.3%)0.21Haemoglobin g/L, median (range)130–160100.0 (73.0–149.0)96.3 (70.0–135.8)0.92Platelets ×109/L, median (range)150–400254 (69–545)130 (46–454)0.0002White blood -Abstract Truncated-

Clinical Characteristics, Complications and Outcomes of Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Related to COVID-19 or Influenza Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation—A Retrospective Cohort Study

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19 and influenza associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19 and influenza H1N1 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

Outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease versus other lung infections requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID-19: Comparison of Outcomes to Non-COVID-19-Related Viral Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome From the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry

Complications during Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in adult patients: Comparing COVID-19- and non-COVID-19-associated respiratory failure

Mortality rates of severe COVID-19-related respiratory failure with and without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the Middle Ruhr Region of Germany

Refractory circulatory failure in COVID-19 patients treated with veno-arterial ECMO a retrospective single-center experience

Severe Patients With ARDS With COVID-19 Treated With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in China: A Retrospective Study

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe COVID-19 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective, nationwide, Danish cohort study

Fit-for-Future: Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic in Primary Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Transports of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Patients

Outcomes associated with prolonged ECMO in COVID-19 associated ARDS: A single center experience

Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation prior to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is not associated with survival in acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by coronavirus disease 2019

Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Used in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A Prospective Observational Comparative Study

A Comparison of Thrombosis and Hemorrhage Rates in Patients With Severe Respiratory Failure Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Influenza Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Impact of Thrombosis and Bleeding in Patients with Severe COVID-19 versus Other Viral Pneumonias in the Context of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Evolving outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Key characteristics impacting survival of COVID-19 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation