Analyses of Bone Regeneration Capacity of Freeze-Dried Bovine Bone and Combined Deproteinized–Demineralized Bovine Bone Particles in Mandibular Defects: The Potential Application of Biological Forms of Bovine-Bone Filler

David Buntoro Kamadjaja,Handhito Satriyo,Aris Setyawan,Yeni Dian Lesmaya,Jefry Wahyudi Safril,Ni Putu Mira Sumarta,Andra Rizqiawan,Coen Pramono Danudiningrat,Ta To Tran
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736291
2021-11-23
European Journal of Dentistry
Abstract:Abstract Objective This study aimed to evaluate bone regeneration capacity of FDBX granules compared to composite DBBM/DFDBX granules for filling of bone defect in rabbit mandible. Material and Methods Critical size defects were created in 45 rabbits' mandible. The defect in the control group is left untreated, while in other groups the defects were filled with FDBX granules and composite DBBM/DFDBX granules, respectively. Specimens were collected at 2, 4, and 8 weeks for histology and immunohistochemical analyses. Significant difference is set at p-value 0.05) with the composite group, while OPG/RANKL ratio, bone healing scores, and trabecular area were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the composite compared to FDBX group. Conclusion Composite DBBM/DFDBX granules, within the limitation of this study, has better bone forming capacity than FDBX granules for filling of bone defects in the mandible.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?