Abstract:The purpose of the paper is to reflect on the recent health care reforms in both developed and developing countries, in the light of the evidence that has accumulated over the last few years about the efficiency and equity of different fiscal and organisational arrangements. The scene is set by a brief review of the definitions of efficiency and equity and of the confusions that often arise; and of the problems of making assessments in practice with real data. The evidence about effectiveness, efficiency and equity at the macro level are reviewed: among OECD countries, there is little evidence that variations in the levels and composition of health service expenditure actually affect levels of health; equity in financing and delivery appears to mirror equity in other sectors in the same countries; about the only solid--although rather limp--conclusion which is transferable is that costs can be contained best via global budgeting. The range of reforms in the North is sketched: despite calls to give people 'freedom' to opt out, public finances continues to be preferred among OECD countries; and the evidence that health care markets can actually function is 'weak'. Whilst geographical redistribution of finance has proved to be possible, inequalities in health remain in most countries. But the overwhelming impression is that the quality of the data base for many of these studies is appalling, and the analytice techniques used are simplistic. The move to introduce user charges in the South is discussed. It seems unlikely that they will raise a significant fraction of overall revenue; exemptions intended for the poor do not always work; and other trends are likely to exacerbate the patchy coverage of health care systems in the South. The final section reflects on the pressures for increased accountability. The emphasis on consumerism in the North has led to an increasing number of poorly designed 'patient satisfaction' surveys; in the South, there has been an increasing rhetoric on community participation, but little sign of actual devolution of control. The flavour of the decade is 'outcome measurement' which has been promoted feverish but with little rigour. We must also be concerned that this emphasis will, once again, be hijacked by the most articulate.

Restructuring health systems for an era of prolonged austerity: an essay by Richard B Saltman and Zachary Cahn

More for less: best patient outcomes in a time of financial restraint

A Complex Systems Science Approach to Healthcare Costs and Quality

The return of austerity imperils global health

Bending the curve through health reform implementation

Risiken und Nebenwirkungen von Sparprogrammen auf die stationäre Medizin in der Schweiz

Reducing Medicare and Medicaid entitlements: a contentious environment ensues

Efficiency and equity implications of the health care reforms

Health care quality, access, cost, workforce, and surgical education: the ultimate perfect storm

An economic analysis of the limits of market based reforms in the English NHS

How International Health System Austerity Responses to the 2008 Financial Crisis Impacted Health System and Workforce Resilience – A Realist Review

The Economics of Public Health: Missing Pieces to the Puzzle of Health System Reform

Fair equality of opportunity critically reexamined: the family and the sustainability of health care systems

Functional status care categories and national health policy

Structural adjustment and health: A conceptual framework and evidence on pathways

Austerity Measures and the Resilience of Zimbabwe's Healthcare System: Challenges and Solutions

Managing acute care

How not to cut health care costs

A fuzzy set approach to economic crisis, austerity and public health. Part II: How are configurations of crisis and austerity related to changes in population health across Europe?

Preconditions for efficiency and affordability in mixed health systems: are they fulfilled in the Australian public–private mix?

Administrative Inefficiency and The United States Healthcare System