Abstract:W the federal government began to dominate funding of U.S. scientific research after World War II, critics from professors to President Eisenhower warned of possible adverse consequences to academic freedom and scientific progress. Their concerns have at least partly been realized in today’s dangerously formulaic top-down funding paradigm: (1) await a solicitation promulgated by a federal agency, often with the voluntary input of external scientists; (2) compile a proposal and wait approximately six months for funding decision; (3) collect data, typically over several years, keeping results proprietary to protect intellectual property and other academic rewards; (4) disseminate knowledge via conferences and peer-review publications, with direct benefit to the public as a desired, but rarely realized, afterthought (Figure 1). At best, the public is told about the results upon completion of this cycle and rarely participates. In the case of the Flint, Michigan disaster, if we had been constrained to this top-down research model, injustices of childhood lead poisoning, vital infrastructure damage and one of the largest Legionnaires’ disease outbreaks in U.S. history may never have been brought to light. Unless academics exercise their academic freedom and occasionally break the rules that implicitly govern conduct of research, practically important and societally relevant problems such as decaying vital infrastructure and environmental injustice will continue to remain out of sight and out of mind. To help expose what is arguably one of the most shocking environmental crimes ever perpetrated by government agencies, it was necessary for us to upend the top-down academic model with a bottom-up approach (Figure 1). Our alternative model overturned the current paradigm by first listening to the public to understand the problem, then volunteering scientific expertise, time and our financial resources toward research needed to expose the problem. This created a public demand to find solutions as expediently as possible. To date, the Flint disaster recovery effort has amounted to nearly a half billion dollars, including $232 million from the State of Michigan, $125 million in foundation grants, and $80 million in U.S. Federal Emergency Funds. Other broader impacts include countless hours of science-based media coverage, and a national conversation on government accountability, societal priorities, ethics, and decaying water infrastructure. Flint reminds us to open our eyes to injustice and our ears to the voices of the public, and to be cognizant of limitations of our top-down funding model. An inherently unbiased funding source does not exist, and we must be prepared to exercise our academic freedom to advance the science needed to address

Role of social connectedness in response to a public health crisis: The case study of the Flint water crisis

From crisis to prevention: mining big data for public health insights during the flint water crisis

Psychological Consequences of the Flint Water Crisis: A Scoping Review

Voices from Flint: Community Perceptions of the Flint Water Crisis

Did the public attribute the Flint Water Crisis to racism as it was happening? Text analysis of Twitter data to examine causal attributions to racism during a public health crisis

Organizing Under Austerity: How Residents’ Concerns Became the Flint Water Crisis

A Population-Based Assessment of Physical Symptoms and Mental Health Outcomes Among Adults Following the Flint Water Crisis

Source Credibility and the Information Quality Matter in Public Engagement on Social Networking Sites During the COVID-19 Crisis.

Youth Perspectives on the Flint Water Crisis and Its Health Effects

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Emotional Reactions to the Flint Water Crisis among Michigan Women in Communities Outside of Flint

Sociodemographic Factors Are Associated with the Abundance of PFAS Sources and Detection in U.S. Community Water Systems

The Effects of the Flint water crisis on the educational outcomes of school-age children

A Data Science Approach to Understanding Residential Water Contamination in Flint

How Do Perceptions of Risk Communicator Attributes Affect Emergency Response? An Examination of a Water Contamination Emergency in Boston, USA

Flint Water Crisis: Data-Driven Risk Assessment Via Residential Water Testing

The Flint Water Crisis: Overturning the Research Paradigm to Advance Science and Defend Public Welfare.

Experiences of the Flint Water Crisis Among Reproductive-Age Michigan Women in Communities Outside of Flint: Differences by Race and Ethnicity

Vicarious structural racism and infant health disparities in Michigan: The Flint Water Crisis

Politics and Public Health: The Flint Drinking Water Crisis.

Utilizing social media for community risk communication in megacities: analysing the impact of WeChat group information interaction and perception on communication satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in Shanghai

An Intercategorical Ecology of Lead Exposure: Complex Environmental Health Vulnerabilities in the Flint Water Crisis