Abstract:Despite its waning influence, Kemalism remains a compelling topic within scholarship on Turkey. In recent years, for instance, a growing literature has critically examined the policies, arrangements, and institutions that underpinned the Kemalist single-party rule (1923–46). Although they have expanded our stock of knowledge on this period and pushed scholarly exchanges beyond polemical debates, most of these studies neglect to account systematically for the origins of the regime and assess it in light of other similar cases from the global south. To address such questions, this paper classifies Kemalism within a category of national-developmentalist regimes. The Turkish case differed from these cases, however, with its low level of institutionalization, particularly its ruling party's limited organizational and mobilizational capacity. While scholars tend to focus on the coercive aspects of Kemalist rule, in reality the regime was built upon a weak party apparatus, a factor that precluded the consolidation of the regime. This paper attributes such an outcome to two factors that gave Mustafa Kemal few incentives to build strong state and party institutions at the onset of his rule, namely (1) a low level of intra-elite conflict and (2) limited popular mobilization. Due to their limited base of support, the Kemalist leadership remained vulnerable to the defection of elites, who could mobilize the popular classes against the ruling party. This paper situates Kemalism as part of a broader category of reformist regimes in the developing world. In so doing, the paper carves out an analytical space wherein scholars can analyze Kemalism in comparative light and highlight the ways with which the Turkish experience differed from other similar cases in the global south.

The EU Policy of the Republican People's Party under Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu: A New Wine in an Old Wine Cellar

De-Europeanisation through Discourse: A Critical Discourse Analysis of AKP’s Election Speeches

Moral Economy Redux: Social Protests in Turkey after the 2001 Economic Crisis

Consolidating and Contesting Authoritarian Neoliberalism in Turkey: Towards a Framework

The role of the opposition in autocratisation: the case of Turkey

Political discourses on Europe and European integration in national election manifestos and party programmes

What Makes Turkey and Turkish Immigrants a Cultural Polarization Issue in Europe? Evidence from European Right-Wing Populist Politics

Turkey and the Middle East and North Africa under the AKP: A Three Level Analysis of Foreign Policy Change

Historical Institutionalism and EU–Turkey Relations: Path Dependence and Critical Junctures in the Accession Process

The Impact of the EU Connection on Turkey's Domestic and Foreign Policy

Nation-Building, Party-Strength, and Regime Consolidation: Kemalism in Comparative Perspective

Reassessing Turkish National Memory: An Analysis of the Representation of Turkish National Memory by the AKP

Public Diplomacy and Democratic Backsliding in Turkey: A Retrospective Look at Government Investment in Soft Power

Critical Junctures of Securitisation: The Case of the AK Party in Turkey

Turkey as a Special and (Almost) Dead Case of EU Enlargement Policy

The Effects of Early Republican Period Political System on Democracy in Türkiye in the Context of Elite Power and Political Culture in Contemporary Political Sociology

Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy Toward Syria: The Return of Securitization

The Alevis and Roma/Gypsy in Turkey: republican freedom revisited

Democratic backsliding and the media: the convergence of news narratives in Turkey

Reform and Capacity Building in the Turkish Foreign Ministry: Bridging the Gap between Ideas and Institutions

Erdoğan and the Muslim Brotherhood: an outside-in approach to Turkish foreign policy in the Middle East