The Role of Lymphocyte-To-Monocyte Ratio In Predicting The Severe Post-Calcific Stenotic Aortic Dilatation In A Chinese Case-Control Study

Shanghao Chen,Zezhong Wu,Yan Yun,Hechen Shen,Diming Zhao,Yanwu Liu,Chengwei Zou,Haizhou Zhang,Zhengjun Wang,Xiaochun Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1043408/v1
2021-11-23
Abstract:Abstract Background: Calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) represents a serious public health threat to elderly patients. Post-calcific stenotic aortic dilatation, a common feature in CAVS patients, might progress into aneurysm and even dissection, potentially lethal consequences of CAVS, and predicts a dismal prognosis. This study sought to testify the role of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), an inflammatory biomarker, in predicting the severe post-calcific stenotic aortic dilatation in a Chinese case-control study. Materials and Methods: 208 consecutive patients with CAVS were recruited retrospectively in a Chinese case- control study, from July 1, 2015 to June 31, 2018. The LMR was statistically analyzed for its prognostic value in the severe post-calcific stenotic aortic dilatation. Results: The LMR was significantly reduced in patients with severe post-calcific stenotic aortic dilatation (2.72 vs. 3.53, p=0.002<0.05) compared to patients without severe post- calcific stenotic aortic dilatation. There was an inverse correlation observed between the maximal diameter of ascending aorta and the LMR in the overall patients (r=-0.217, p=0.002<0.05). For severe post-calcific stenotic aortic dilatation, the incidence of high- LMR group was statistically lower than that of low-LMR group (19.7% vs. 43.9%, p<0.001). And maximal diameter of ascending aorta was significantly reduced in the high-LMR group (4.35vs. 4.76, p=0.003<0.05) compared to low-LMR group. Additionally, the LMR was identified in the multivariate analysis as an independent predictor of severe post-calcific stenotic aortic dilatation (OR 0.743, 95% CI: [0.573- 0.964], p=0.025). Conclusions: This study provided the evidence of an inverse correlation between the severe post- calcific stenotic aortic dilatation and LMR. And the LMR is potentially applied as an independent predictor of severe post-calcific stenotic aortic dilatation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?