Climate Change Effects On Height-Diameter Allometric Relationship Vary With Tree Species And Size For Larch Plantations In Northern And Northeastern China

Qigang Xu,Xiangdong Lei,Hao Zang,Weisheng Zeng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1081902/v1
2021-11-23
Abstract:Abstract Background: Tree height-diameter relationship is very important in forest investigation, understanding forest ecosystem structure and estimating carbon storage. Climate change may modify the relationship. However, our understanding of the effects of climate change on height-diameter allometric growth is still limited at large scale. Methods: In this study, we explore how the climate change effects on height-diameter allometric relationship vary with tree species and size for larch plantations in northern and northeastern China. Based on the repeated measurement data of 535 plots from the 6th to 8th national forest inventory of China, climate-sensitive tree height-diameter models of Larix plantations in north and northeast China were developed by two-level nonlinear mixed effect (NLME) method. The final model was used to analyze the height-diameter relationship of different Larch species under RCP2.6, RCP 4.5, and RCP8.5 climate change scenarios from 2010 to 2100. Results: The values of B(adjusted coefficient of determination), MAE(mean absolute error) and RMSE(root mean squared error) of the NLME models for calibration data were 0.92, 0.76m and 1.06m, respectively. The inclusion of climate variables MAT (Mean annual temperature), CMD (Hargreaves climatic moisture deficit) with random effects was able to increase a by 19.5% and reduce the AIC (Akaike’s information criterion), MAE and RMSE by 22.2%, 44.5% and 41.8%, respectively. The climate sensitivity was ranked as L. gmelinii > the unidentified species group > L. pincipis-rupprechtii > L. kaempferi > L. olgensis under RCP4.5, but L. gmelinii > L. pincipis-rupprechtii > the unidentified species group > L. olgensis > L. kaempferi under RCP2.6 and RCP8.5. Conclusion: According to the climate sensitivity, tree species could be classified as group I( L. gmelinii , L. pincipis-rupprechtii and the unidentified species group) with large c (from -4.77% to 18.17%) and group II ( L. kaempferi and L. olgensis ) with small k (from -6.37% to 9.4%).Large trees were more sensitive to climate change than small trees.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?