Abstract:The article explores the dispute about the nature of a crime (guilt) and a punishment (responsibility) in the literary heritage of the Great Russian writers – F.M. Dostoevsky and L.N. Tolstoy. In main task is to determine the difference in the approaches of writers to understanding crime and punishment. This problem is worked out by means of a comparative analysis on the views F.M. Dostoevsky and L.N. Tolstoy. They both provide original ideas about the source of a crime: a human soul or the social environment. It is revealed that Dostoevskys characters are searching for response to a question in the deepest foundations of a human soul, whereas, according to Tolstoy, the social environment – people themselves as the creators of their environment, lead other people to crimes and then punish them. It is revealed that F.M. Dostoevsky gives his own understanding of the essence of guilt and responsibility. Guilt is a consequence of the fall of man (the fall away from God). As long as a man is separated from God, he feels guilty about his free choice. It is stated that according to the writers, either a man punishes himself with a crime and then the crime becomes a punishment (Dostoevsky), or others punish him and commit a crime violating the Commandment: "Condemn not, and you shall not be condemned" (Tolstoy). Ultimately, a crimes as well as repentance always occur as a result of a change in a human soul. According to Dostoevsky, these actions require a man to change his spiritual nature. It turns out that at the same time, Tolstoy believed that a crime and a punishment cannot take place outside the social environment. This conclusion is confirmed in modern social practice. It is stated that modern society has mitigated punishments and demonstrated that partially limited rights and the positive social influence more effectively contribute to the correction of a man.

The Natural Meaning of Crime and Punishment: Denying and Affirming Freedom

A Modern View of Crime

Natural Interpretation in Criminal Law

A Framework Theory of Punishment

Fundamental Questions about Responsibility

Revisiting the Inevitability of Punishment for Criminal Offense: An Ethical Understanding of the Problem

Moral Cognition in Criminal Punishment

On the Empirical Generalizations of the Concept of the Concrete Crime

Connections (and Limits) Between Law and Natural Sciences: The Concepts of Causality and Culpability from the Perspective of Criminal Law

Understanding the Fundamental Nature of Crime in Criminal Law

Guilt and Responsibility for Crime in the Philosophical Views of L.N. Tolstoy and F.M. Dostoevsky

The Voice of the Criminal Law

The penology of racial innocence: the erasure of racism in the study and practice of punishment

Consequence and Discretionary Action of Sentencing ——the Prohibition of Consequential Responsibility, Double Evaluation and Indirect Punishment

Causes of Crime: A Critical Analysis

The Theory of Conduct without Value and Positive General Prevention

On the question of the role of the principle of justice in the system of principles of criminal punishment

People accept breaks in the causal chain between crime and punishment

Introduction: The Challenge of Uncovering and Using Emotions in Criminal Justice

Why Sentencing Needs a Separate Trial in the Continental System

The Notion of Violating Norms in Criminal Law