Why Did Napoleon Do It? Hubris, Security Dilemmas, Brinksmanship, and the 1812 Russian Campaign

William Nester

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2013.817922

2013-09-01

Diplomacy and Statecraft

Abstract:This article explores the geopolitical and psychological reasons behind Napoleon's invasion of Russia.

international relations,history

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

“With the Tatar Barbarism of Batu:” References to History in Russian Works Concerning Napoleon’s Campaign, 1812–1814

Kati Parppei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18763316-04602003

2019-08-27

Russian History

Abstract:The invasion of Napoleon’s troops all the way to Moscow in 1812 has been seen as a turning point that accelerated the development of nationalistic thinking in Russia, already burgeoning at the turn of the century. Depictions of the invasion, produced from 1812–1814 indicate that perceptions of the collective past were in a state of both fermentation and formation, together with questions of Russia’s geopolitical position. The authors were leaning simultaneously on the eighteenth-century image of enlightened, imperial and European Russia, and the medieval ideas of religion as the dividing line between “us” and “them.”
War, Economy and Utopianism: Russia after the Napoleonic Era

Janet M. Hartley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-40649-1_5

2016-01-01

Abstract:The Napoleonic Wars transformed the status of the Russian Empire within Europe. At the beginning of the campaigns the perception of the other major European powers was that Russia was not capable of inflicting a major defeat on Napoleon without allied support. Alexander I was humiliated at the Battle of Austerlitz on 2 December 1805, and almost suffered the indignity of being captured. Following a further defeat at the Battle of Friedland in June 1807, Alexander had to come to terms with Napoleon at Tilsit (7 July 1807) and had to recognize the dominant position of the French Emperor in central and eastern Europe. Relations between France and Russia deteriorated, particularly as a result of French influence over Poland and the implementation of the Continental System, and led to the invasion of Russia in June 1812 by a massive army of some 680,000 men. The presence of Napoleon’s troops in the Russian Empire was brief compared with the experience of some other European countries, but traumatic in terms of casualties suffered in major battles (Smolensk on 16–18 August and Borodino on 7 September), and the occupation of Moscow. The retreat started in mid-October and the Russian campaign effectively ended on 14 December 1812, with the last troops of the Grande Armée leaving Russian soil. But by now Russia had established its military superiority and became the dominant partner of the coalition which pushed Napoleon back to the borders of France.
Napoleon’s Discordant Historical Legacy: Republican Hero or Opportunistic Tyrant?

Luke Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i2.6818

2024-05-31

Journal of Student Research

Abstract:Heroic republican crusader to some, brutal despot to some, there is perhaps no more divisive European figure of the 19th century as the French general Napoleon Bonaparte. Napoleon is often characterized as one of two extremes, hero or tyrant, and this paper seeks to seek out a more nuanced historical image. This paper explores the major sociopolitical and military events that occurred around the newly founded Republic of France as she entered the 19th century which allowed for Napoleon to rise to power, and seeks to shed light on both Napoleon himself as an individual, as well as the impacts of his conquests and political decisions.
A Foreign Artist and a Russian War: Peter von Hess, a Case Study in Imperial Patronage and National Identity

Andrew M. Nedd

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/arts12040171

2023-08-09

Arts

Abstract:A number of foreign artists received the earliest commissions to represent Napoleon's Russian Campaign of 1812 for Russian emperors. My paper is a case study of a German artist who served the Russian Imperial court. Peter von Hess trained at the Academy in Munich and served both King Ludwig I of Bavaria and Otto I of Greece. In 1839, Emperor Nicholas I commissioned the artist to complete 12 monumental canvases for the Winter Palace representing key battles that followed Napoleon's invasion of Russia in 1812. While earlier battle paintings and portraits commissioned by Alexander I dealt only with elite officers and the emperor, Hess's paintings elevated the common Russian as the bearers of a great sacrifice and as the true defenders of Russia. This representational shift is the product of changing ideas concerning Russia's involvement in several alliances from 1803 to 1815 that included Austria, England, Sweden, and Prussia. In addition, over the course of Nicholas I's reign, the concepts of "autocracy, orthodoxy, nationality" crept into representations of the Russian experience of the Napoleonic wars.
The Napoleon mystique and British poets

Mary Anne Mc Danel de García

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21830/19006586.382

2019-04-01

Revista Científica General José María Córdova

Abstract:This reflection on the influence of Napoleon and the consequences of the wars on the major British poets of the Romantic era is meant to illustrate how the reactions of both nobility and commoners are recorded in literature and media. The dual perception of Napoleon as both hero and tyrant and the atrocious suffering of those at home and bloody battles are manifest in the works of the major poets, William Wordsworth, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Percy Bysshe Shelly, and especially George Gordon, Lord Byron. Even today, Napoleon transcends precise definition and he has inspired some of the greatest poets in British literature
The Religious Element of the Myth of Napoleon in the Novel Crime and Punishment: The Image of “Napoleon-Prophet” and the Mystic Sects of Russian Schismatics, Worshippers of Napoleon

Nikolay N. Podosokorsky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2022-2-89-143

2022-01-01

Abstract:The article is dedicated to the presence of the Napoleonic myth in Dostoevsky’s novel Crime and Punishment (1866) through its religious aspect, namely the historical and cultural mergence of Napoleon and Mohammed and the worship of Napoleon among the mystic sects of Russian schismatics in the first half of the 19th century. The formation of a lasting perception of Napoleon Bonaparte as the new “prophet”, “Mohammed of the West” — which can be found in Stendhal, Alexandre Dumas, Honoré de Balzac, and others — is here traced, as well as the way Napoleon used religion and art for political aims during the Egyptian expedition and after. Particular attention is dedicated to Voltaire’s play Mahomet (1741) and its influence on Napoleon (and possibly on Dostoevsky) through theatre performances. Rodion Raskolnikov’s Napoleonic theory is explained through an immersion in the history of the wars between Russia and France and of the Russian sectarian movement, where in 1920s-1940s could be found more than one sect worshipping Napoleon. According to the reports of secret police agents, they tacitly gathered in Moscow and worshipped a bust of Napoleon the Emperor, believing that he was not dead but alive, and would soon appear to “command the righteous regiments to restore the shattered order”. Dostoevsky could use this original mystical phenomenon in his novel. It is no coincidence that one of the doubles-substitutes for the main character in Crime and Punishment is the schismatic Mikolka, who was born in the Ryazan province, where Raskolnikov’s mother and sister lived.
Why did Putin go too far? The rationality of Vladimir Putin’s decision to begin a war with Ukraine

Roman Bäcker,Joanna Rak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2022.6.3.04

2022-08-23

Society Register

Abstract:The paper aims to determine the extent of the rationality of Vladimir Putin’s decision to begin a war with Ukraine. Its central argument is that this decision was irrational on three levels. Firstly, the Russian decision-making elites failed to foresee the ability of the Ukrainian army and people to resist efficiently. It might have resulted from the imperial superiority syndrome reinforced by the experiences of 2014. Secondly, the elites treated the reports on the Russian army’s combat readiness as reliable and did not make an effort to verify them. Probably no one can determine the scale of the kleptocracy, and therefore no one has reliable data on the quality of the Russian army’s combat preparation. Thirdly, the elites failed to envisage the scale of support for Ukraine from Western democracies. What is more, they did not take into account the democratic rationality of Western politicians. The same politicians who appeared to Putin to be weak and incapable of action, immediately after the mass social protests and condemnation of Russia’s aggression by public opinion, acted following the clearly expressed will of the political nation. The article reflects on the systemic reasons for such a poor definition of the decision-making situation and then tries to formulate the general relationship between the quality of the decision-making elite and the acceleration of the bifurcation processes of the Russian autocratic regime.
Do Autocrats Need a Foreign Enemy? Evidence from Fortress Russia

Henry E. Hale,Adam C. Lenton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00486

2024-01-01

International Security

Abstract:Abstract Conventional thinking suggests that autocrats need enemies and thus have incentives to create them. Russia's Vladimir Putin is often thought to reap domestic legitimacy from belligerence. We examine multiple public opinion datasets collected in Russia that span Putin's presidency to confirm that he gains popularity from a sense of Western threat. But findings indicate that until 2021, these gains came primarily from a carefully cultivated domestic reputation for responding to threats with moderation instead of bellicosity. Our survey experiment further suggests that Putin wins as much support when he is prudent and cooperative as when he is hostile and aggressive. These findings add to evidence that Russia's full-scale 2022 invasion of Ukraine was not a war of domestic political necessity. They also help explain why Putin felt that he had to promote the invasion at home as a careful, limited, defensive act rather than something glorious for which the Russian population should fully mobilize. Even the most aggressive autocrats may still cater to public preferences for moderate foreign policy.

international relations
In Between Deterring and Threatening War: Russia-NATO Strategic Interaction

Adelina Andrei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.es.2024.1-10

2024-07-01

Economy and sociology

Abstract:Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 marked a significant turning point in the post-World War II history of Europe, with the realist and idealist views on international relations offering contrasting interpretations of its underlying sources. While each perspective provides valuable insights, neither captures entirely the complex dynamics of foreign affairs, which frequently straddle a middle ground between the conflictual and cooperative states of nations. This paper takes on a game theory approach to bridge the gap between the realist and idealist views on international relations, with the analysis of two scenarios: a limited deterrence game, viewing the conflict as a proxy war between NATO and Russia, and an extended deterrence game, seeing the conflict as a direct war between Russia and Ukraine with potential help from NATO. The findings offer a nuanced understanding of the dynamics between Russia, Ukraine, and NATO with practical significance, suggesting that NATO should have employed a strategy of decisive support for Ukraine, as anything less allowed Russia to underestimate the consequences of the full-scale invasion.
A Short Note on Napoleon's Political Personality

董小燕

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942x.2001.04.013

2001-01-01

Abstract:Napoleon was a ruler of strong political personality. The formation of this complicated self-contradicting personality was not only related to his natural temperament and childhood experience, but also to the swiftly shifting political situation of the French Revolution and his role in politics. His political personality had a twofold influence on France and its Revolution: On the one hand, he was a successor of the Revolution in that he inherited and promoted the revolutionary ideals and principles; while on the other, he became a convict condemned for betraying the Revolution to the European feudalism.
Napoleon-Sun in Dostoevsky’s Novel Crime and Punishment

Nikolay N Podosokorsky,A M Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences,Nikolay N. Podosokorsky,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2023-2-57-105

2023-01-01

Abstract:The article is dedicated to the historical and cultural fusion of the Napoleonic and solar myth and its reflection in Dostoevsky’s novel Crime and Punishment. The plea of investigator Porfiry Petrovich to Rodion Raskolnikov during their third conversation “to become the sun” affects not only the Christian, as many researchers have already noticed, but also the Napoleonic side of the personality of the hero, who is trying to become the new Petersburg’s legislator of humanity. Special attention is paid to the evolution of the concept of “the Sun of Austerlitz,” which is usually understood as the highest triumph of Napoleon during his entire military career, and the centennial tradition of identifying great rulers with the Sun (Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, Louis XIV, Napoleon, etc.). The formation of the solar cult of Napoleon during the First Empire in France and the role of the sun in the novel Crime and Punishment are considered in detail. It is explained why Raskolnikov, whose name Rodion refers to the island of Rhodes, dedicated to Helios, the god of the sun, mentions a variety of battles and campaigns involving his idol (the Siege of Toulon, the Egyptian campaign, the crossing of the Alps, the War of 1812, Waterloo, etc.) but completely ignores the Battle of Austerlitz, and why the sun the hero comes across is almost always setting. In addition, the article traces the connection between Napoleon and Apollo in the European culture of the first half of the 19th century and in Dostoevsky’s work.
Locating the Ottomans in Napoleon’s World

Virginia H. Aksan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137455475_20

2016-01-01

Abstract:Historians writing about the 1798 French invasion of Egypt style Napoleon Bonaparte as the grand sultan (Sultan Kebir) and conqueror of Egypt.1 By contrast, Ottoman Sultan Se lim III (1787–1807) has been viewed as weak, indecisive and incapable of implementing his visionary reform agenda, in a general condemnation of Ottoman feebleness that marks most of the well-known narratives. The Bonaparte invasion inaugurated an interventionist school of both British and French imperialism, a fumbling towards imperial methods, driven by their great power rivalries with Russia and later Prussia, but equally committed to a civilizing mission and the preferential markets represented by the sprawling Ottoman Empire.
A war foretold: How Western mainstream news media omitted NATO eastward expansion as a contributing factor to Russia’s 2022 invasion of the Ukraine

Florian Zollmann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352231216908

2023-12-30

Abstract:This article assesses how Western mainstream news media framed causal factors of Russia’s 2022 invasion of the Ukraine. The article is based on a synthesis and integration of scholarly studies as well as a primary data analysis of Western mainstream newspaper reporting. The research firstly conducts an integrative literature review investigating how Western mainstream news media have reported on Russia and the new Cold War more broadly. Using this as a backdrop, a quantitative and qualitative content study investigates how causes of the 2022 invasion of Ukraine were framed in the US, the UK and the German press. To contextualize news media framing, the second section critically assesses the Western diplomatic and historical record of NATO expansion. The article identifies two competing explanatory frameworks: the dominant Western news media narrative assumes that Russia/Putin’s imperial ambitions and nefarious traits have caused the war, and a second narrative, advanced by several scholars, former diplomats and selected journalists, asserts that NATO’s eastward expansion created the context for Russia’s invasion. The article concludes that the second narrative has been de-emphasized in the news. Such framing is contrary to the historical and documentary record, and links to a marginalization of non-military solutions to solve the conflict.
Russians' Attitudes Towards the War in Ukraine

Robin Wollast,Joseph B. Phillips,Illia Yahiiaiev,Karine Malysheva,Olivier Klein,Nikhil K. Sengupta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.3118

2024-10-20

European Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract:The Russian invasion of Ukraine has caused considerable military casualties on both sides and widespread harm to Ukrainian civilians. While polls suggest that a slim majority of Russians endorse the invasion, the factors underpinning this support remain uncertain. We investigated factors associated with support for the war among Russians. In three large, diverse, samples of Russian adults (total N = 2856), we extend the dual process motivational model to the context of international warfare, focusing on two key ideologies: right‐wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO). Consistent with polling data, we find that approximately half of the participants support the war. Across studies, RWA, especially its submission facet, emerges as a strong and consistent predictor of increased support for the war in Ukraine. In contrast, the associations with SDO are weaker and more inconsistent, with anti‐egalitarianism playing only a minor role in opposing peace efforts. Additionally, factors such as Russian identification, nationalism, group efficacy, war‐related misperceptions and collective narcissism also contribute to war support. Our findings suggest that Russian support for the war may reflect broader support for the existing regime with backing for the military intervention serving as a demonstration of loyalty to Vladimir Putin and his government.

psychology, social
“Napoleonic” Petersburg and its Reflection in Dostoevsky’s Novel Crime and Punishment

Nikolay N. Podosokorsky,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2022-4-71-135

2022-01-01

Abstract:The article is devoted to a specific socio-cultural phenomenon, called by the author “Napoleonic” Petersburg, and its reflection in Dostoevsky’s novel Crime and Punishment (1866). In the late 1830s — 1860s the Napoleonic myth manifested itself in several aspects of the cultural life of the capital of the Russian Empire: the names of public institutions, restaurant menus, apartment decorations, museum rarities, monuments, street shows, theatrical productions, literary works, psychological imitation of Napoleon, etc. The article presents an attempt to reconstruct how the “Napoleonic” Petersburg was formed and looked like during the time when Fyodor Dostoevsky, who dedicated several works to the life of people in Petersburg, fascinated by Napoleon (“Mr. Prokharchin,” White Nights, Notes from the Underground, etc.), lived and worked in it, before the creation of Crime and Punishment. The author’s research focuses on the novel Crime and Punishment and Rodion Raskolnikov, trying to become a new Napoleon and talking about the transformation of St. Petersburg and the greatness of historical figures as “living monuments” on which there is “not a body, but bronze.” It is shown how the realities of St. Petersburg (the Egyptian Bridge, the Alexander Column, the Kazan Cathedral, etc.) relate to the Napoleonic myth and are indirectly reflected in the text of Dostoevsky’s novel.
The White Knight and the Red Queen

Gulnaz Sharafutdinova

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197502938.003.0002

2020-10-22

Abstract:This chapter relies on the “new psychology of leadership”—an approach to analyzing leadership process relying on social identity theory—to explain the relationship between Vladimir Putin and the Russian people. The main insights of this theory highlight the key elements that make Putin’s leadership effective. These are the shared popular perceptions: (1) that Putin is “one of us”; (2) that he is “doing it for us”; (3) that he is “crafting a sense of us”; and (4) that he is “making us matter.” In this chapter I address each of these elements conceived as a glue that links the followers to the leader and discuss how these sentiments get manifested in people’s own articulations. This chapter also discusses the results of an original survey experiment that aimed at testing the political implications of prompting insecure collective identity.
The Ideological and Ontological Causes of Russia’s War on Ukraine. West versus East; Tyranny versus Democracy

Olha Hordiichuk

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2023.1.1

2023-07-31

ETHICS IN PROGRESS

Abstract:The article deals with the causes of Russia’s war on Ukraine, which is based on political and geopolitical interests, economic and military strategies, ambitions of individual political leaders, and mentality factors. The ontological basis of the war is the historically formed fundamental difference between the spiritual world, mentality traits of Ukrainians and Russians, which formed under the influence of a particular culture, with its ethnic, value and worldview coordinates, and under the influence of ideologies that determined the features of social and political life at different historical times. A strong spiritual system is created in the social and cultural space of the state, which preserves its values from generation to generation in the culture, forming a stable mentality and enduring attitudes. Their conceptual comprehension expands the context of cause-and-effect connections, helps to understand the situation more deeply and to choose optimal effective mechanisms for gradually successfully resolving the complex geopolitical situation that threatens the whole world.
B.N. Chicherin: The Crimean War as a Reflection of the Crisis of the Russian Empire

A. I. Narezhnyi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/s1019331623090071

IF: 0.552

2024-02-29

Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Abstract:Based on the works of a prominent representative of the liberal pro-Western trend in Russian social thought B.N. Chicherin, his views on the causes and unsuccessful for Russia outcome of the Crimean War are examined. The components of the author's concept are revealed, which were formulated by him in identifying the main trends of European politics in the first half of the 19th century and assessing the political consequences of the formation of the Holy Alliance and the activities of its participants, aimed at preserving the monarchical principle in European countries by any means. Particular attention is paid to Chicherin's analysis of the reasons for the conservative turn in the foreign and domestic policies of the government of Nicholas I and the author's substantiation of the thesis that the European choice of Peter I did not guarantee progressive advance in the development of Russia but only opened opportunities, the implementation of which depended on the policy of the imperial authorities. In this context, such features of the system of autocratic governance of the country are considered as the predominance of the personal principle and the lack of opportunities and mechanisms for representatives of society to influence the decisions, which were defined by Chicherin as major factors that contributed to the establishment of a protective course in foreign and domestic policy. The author considers the "European loneliness" of Russia and stagnation in socioeconomic development to be a consequence of this policy, which determined the country's defeat in the Crimean War, which, however, is considered by Chicherin not only as evidence of the crisis of the existing system but also as an incentive for renewal based on a program in the development of which he actively participated.

multidisciplinary sciences,history & philosophy of science
The Nationalization of Patriotism in Russian Literature during the Crimean War: Institutions, Everyday Nationalism, and Images of Peasants

Alexey Vdovin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/russ.12564

2023-09-17

The Russian Review

Abstract:This article explores the issue of Russian imperial nationalism in the early phase of its formation, namely the nationalization of patriotism in literature during the Crimean War, 1853–56. Using historical studies and theories of nationalism, the author shows how and why an acute discourse of a nationalistic experience of community uniting the elite with the common people arose in St. Petersburg society, theater, and literature. Drawing on many published and archival materials, the article describes the institutions of escalating nationalism (thick journals, newspapers, the Maritime Ministry, theater, salons, and circles), everyday rituals (wearing "Russian" clothes), and the images of peasants, who in the fiction of Aleksei Potekhin, Aleksei Pisemskii, Ivan Gorbunov, Ivan Turgenev, and Dmitrii Grigorovich acted as bearers of authentic "Russianness." The growing popularity of these writers' texts can be explained by the fact that they demonstratively linked the psychology and subjectivity of peasant characters with their ethnic identity. Contrary to official propaganda that portrayed peasants as loyal to the tsar, faith, and Fatherland, the new representation satisfied the demand of the elite and socially diverse theater audience for images of unity within a single national community and compensated for the disappointment of defeats at the front.
"Vicious Circle" of War: Metaphorization of Russia's Invasion of Ukraine in Éric Zemmour's Twitter Communication

Olena Siden

DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2491.2024.2213

2024-01-01

Studia Philologica

Abstract:In the crucible of conflict, the discourse employed by political leaders transcends the mere conveyance of information, delving into the realm of strategic communication and persuasion. Twitter, with its brevity and widespread usage among political actors, offers a rich source for investigating political discourse dynamics. Particularly notable is the pervasive use of metaphors by politicians during times of crisis, a linguistic phenomenon that extends beyond its conventional literary function to assume a critical role in shaping public perceptions, fostering unity, and framing the narrative of conflict. This article focuses on the analysis of political communication of Éric Zemmour, a prominent figure in the contemporary French political landscape, on Twitter to reveal main functions of metaphors during the first year of the Russian full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The research has been conducted using Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) as the main approach and elements of Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT). By integrating these methodologies, the study revealed that Éric Zemmour employs conceptual and traditional metaphors to present to explain relations between France-Ukraine-Russia, enhance own credibility and trustworthiness, shape public opinion, simplify the complex geopolitical event, evoke emotional responses, appeal to the national pride and identity, construct social actors and events, underscore the urgency and seriousness of the current situation, and personify the subjects. The paper thus provides a more nuanced understanding of the linguistic and conceptual mechanisms of metaphors in Zemmour's Twitter communication during a crucial geopolitical event.

Why Did Napoleon Do It? Hubris, Security Dilemmas, Brinksmanship, and the 1812 Russian Campaign

“With the Tatar Barbarism of Batu:” References to History in Russian Works Concerning Napoleon’s Campaign, 1812–1814

War, Economy and Utopianism: Russia after the Napoleonic Era

Napoleon’s Discordant Historical Legacy: Republican Hero or Opportunistic Tyrant?

A Foreign Artist and a Russian War: Peter von Hess, a Case Study in Imperial Patronage and National Identity

The Napoleon mystique and British poets

The Religious Element of the Myth of Napoleon in the Novel Crime and Punishment: The Image of “Napoleon-Prophet” and the Mystic Sects of Russian Schismatics, Worshippers of Napoleon

Why did Putin go too far? The rationality of Vladimir Putin’s decision to begin a war with Ukraine

Do Autocrats Need a Foreign Enemy? Evidence from Fortress Russia

In Between Deterring and Threatening War: Russia-NATO Strategic Interaction

A Short Note on Napoleon's Political Personality

Napoleon-Sun in Dostoevsky’s Novel Crime and Punishment

Locating the Ottomans in Napoleon’s World

A war foretold: How Western mainstream news media omitted NATO eastward expansion as a contributing factor to Russia’s 2022 invasion of the Ukraine

Russians' Attitudes Towards the War in Ukraine

“Napoleonic” Petersburg and its Reflection in Dostoevsky’s Novel Crime and Punishment

The White Knight and the Red Queen

The Ideological and Ontological Causes of Russia’s War on Ukraine. West versus East; Tyranny versus Democracy

B.N. Chicherin: The Crimean War as a Reflection of the Crisis of the Russian Empire

The Nationalization of Patriotism in Russian Literature during the Crimean War: Institutions, Everyday Nationalism, and Images of Peasants

"Vicious Circle" of War: Metaphorization of Russia's Invasion of Ukraine in Éric Zemmour's Twitter Communication