Crystal Structure of an Anisotropic Pyrope Garnet That Contains Two Cubic Phases

Sytle M. Antao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min11121320
IF: 2.5
2021-11-26
Minerals
Abstract:The crystal structure of two different samples of pyrope garnet, ideally Mg3Al2Si3O12, from South Africa was refined using the Rietveld method, space group Ia3 ̄d, and monochromatic synchrotron high-resolution powder X-ray diffraction (HRPXRD) data. Sample 1 from Wesselton Mine is a single cubic phase and is optically isotropic. Electron-probe microanalysis (EPMA) provided an average composition {Mg2.30Fe2+0.26Ca0.42Mn2+0.02}∑3[Al1.53Fe3+0.06Cr3+0.40Ti4+0.01Fe2+0.01]∑2Si3O12, which contains a significant amount of Cr cations. The unit-cell parameter (Å) and bond distances (Å) are a = 11.56197(1) Å, average = 2.2985, Al-O = 1.9101(4), and Si-O = 1.6343(3) Å. Sample 2 from De Beers Diamond Mine has an average composition {Mg2.33Fe2+0.33Ca0.33Mn2+0.01}∑3[Al1.73Fe3+0.12Cr3+0.06Ti4+0.05Fe2+0.05]∑2Si3O12 and is a fine-scale intergrowth of two cubic phases. The weight percentage, unit-cell parameter (Å), and bond distances (Å) for phase 2a are 62.2(1)%, a = 11.56185(1) Å, average = 2.3006, Al-O = 1.9080(4), Si-O = 1.6334(4) Å. The corresponding values for phase 2b are 37.8(1)%, a = 11.53896(1) Å, average = 2.2954, Al-O = 1.9020(6), Si-O = 1.6334(6) Å. The two cubic phases in sample 2 cause the crystal to be optically anisotropic because of strain induce birefringence. The unit-cell parameter and bond distances for sample 1 are similar to those in phase 2a.
geochemistry & geophysics,mineralogy,mining & mineral processing
What problem does this paper attempt to address?