Abstract:The domain of Enterprise Information Systems Engineering uses many different conceptual modelling languages and methods to specify the requirements of a system under development. The complexity of the systems under development may require addressing different perspectives with different models, such as the data and process perspectives. The modeller will thus have to choose the appropriate (set of) modelling languages according to their specific modelling goal. Given that the different aspects relate to a single system, ideally, the models that capture the different perspectives should be aligned and consistent to ensure their integration. Each candidate (set of) modelling languages comes with advantages and disadvantages. To make an informed choice in this matter, the modeller should select a number of criteria relevant to their problem domain and compare candidate modelling languages based on these criteria. A comprehensive evaluation framework for integrated modelling approaches, that considers more general aspects such as understandability, ease of use, model quality, etc. besides the ability to model the desired aspects, does not yet exist and is therefore the focus of this paper. In recent years, several combinations of modelling languages have been investigated. Amongst these combinations, data + process modelling has attracted a lot of interest, and, interestingly, evaluation frameworks for this combination have been proposed as well. Therefore, this paper will primarily focus on the integrated multi-modelling of data and processes, including the process-related viewpoints of users and authorisations. The contribution of this paper is two-fold: on a theoretical level, the paper provides an overview of existing evaluation frameworks in the literature, builds a more complete set of evaluation criteria and proposes a unified taxonomy for the classification of these evaluation criteria (TEC-MAP); on a practical level, the paper provides guidance and support to the modeller for selecting the appropriate evaluation criteria for their problem domain and presents three examples of the application of TEC-MAP.

A Methodological Evaluation of Business Process Compliance Management Frameworks

Three Decades of Formal Methods in Business Process Compliance: A Systematic Literature Review

Towards a Formal Framework for Partial Compliance of Business Processes

A systematic literature review on compliance requirements management of business processes

Compliance Management in Business Processes

A compliance assessment system for incident management process

Towards Measuring and Quantifying the Comprehensibility of Process Models -- The Process Model Comprehension Framework

A Taxonomy of Compliance Processes for Business Process Compliance

Separating Compliance Management and Business Process Management

Predictive Compliance Monitoring in Process-Aware Information Systems: State of the Art, Functionalities, Research Directions

Criteria Based Evaluation Framework for Service Oriented Methodologies

Business Process Compliance Using Reference Models of Law

BPMN extension evaluation for security requirements engineering framework

A fuzzy group Electre method for electronic supply chain management framework selection

A Framework for Evaluating Model-Driven Self-adaptive Software Systems

An approach for a business-driven cloudcompliance analysis covering public sector process improvement requirements

Privacy Impact Assessment: Comparing methodologies with a focus on practicality

TEC-MAP: a taxonomy of evaluation criteria and its application to the multi-modelling of data and processes

ICT Support for Regulatory Compliance of Business Processes

Integration of Business Modelling Methods for Enterprise Information System Analysis and User Requirements Gathering

A Framework for Cloud Security Risk Management Based on the Business Objectives of Organizations