Abstract:Poorer citizens generally participate less in politics; at the same time, the income-based gap in participation is not the same across democracies. Whereas in Denmark in 1977 turnout among poorer citizens was 6 percentage points higher than among wealthier ones, in the United States in 1988 the gap is reversed: turnout among wealthier Americans is 31 percentage points higher than among their poorer peers. Existing attempts at understanding the sources of this variation point to macro-level factors, such as compulsory voting, ballot complexity, or income inequality (Gallego, 2015; Solt, 2008). Though important, we argue that existing accounts aren't successful in explaining temporal variation in this participation gap, over periods of time in which the institutional framework is stable. We propose instead a largely neglected, yet plausible, reason for why a differential effect of income on political participation exists: the characteristics of the welfare state. In addition to providing resources relevant to participation, welfare state arrangements also create political constituencies that can be mobilized around a shared goal by political entrepreneurs. Building on Schneider and Makszin's (2014) education-based analysis we inductively develop, with the use of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), various welfare regime types that condition patterns of income-based participatory inequality in democracies. These are produced based on an original data set of roughly 150 merged surveys from 19 OECD members, between 1960 and 2010. We label these types the supportive and mobilizing welfare regimes, along with their non-mobilizing and non-supportive counterparts. These welfare state regimes correspond to different mechanisms through which welfare state characteristics shape participatory patterns: (1) resource endowments available to individuals for participation and (2) unions' and parties' ability to politically mobilize and inform their members. We complement our aggregate-level QCA analysis with individual-level tests of these hypothesized mechanisms. Relying on six cross-national survey programs, such as the European Social Survey or the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, we find consistent support for the mobilization-based mechanisms, while revealing mixed evidence that they also spill over into attitudinal factors which underpin participation. Only weaker evidence is found for our resource-based mechanisms. Overall, our results indicate the effect of welfare state characteristics on political participation gaps in advanced industrial democracies. Welfare state reforms, and in particular retrenchment, are likely to have (damaging) consequences for democracy.

The Unintended Consequences of Nation-Making Institutions for Civil Society Development

The Rise of Grassroots Civil Society under One-Party Rule: The Case of China's Homeowner Associations

Albanian Civil Society and its Impact on Cultural Heritage Values on the Country's Development

Is the Case of Wenzhou Industrial Association Exceptional in the Chinese Context? Development and Challenges of China's Civil Society

Welfare States Matter for Democracy: Income-based Participatory Inequality in Post-WW 2 Western Democracies

The Effects of Early Republican Period Political System on Democracy in Türkiye in the Context of Elite Power and Political Culture in Contemporary Political Sociology

Preserving Space for Volunteers: Exploring the Links between Voluntary Welfare Organisations, Volunteering and Citizenship

The role of constructive patriotism in the relationship of basic human values and active citizenship for emerging adults in Türkiye

Civil Society – Indispensable Element of Contemporary Constitutional Democracy

Local Governance and Business Associations in Wenzhou: a model for the road to civil society in China?

The impact of decentralization on participation in formal organizations in Albania: Lessons for community-based interventions

Using the Classroom to Cultivate Student Support for Participation in Campus Life: The Call for Civic Education Interventions

Helping hands: intentional communities and social capital development. Evidence from Portugal

Residential satisfaction assessment of a 1970s modernist housing community in Istanbul: searching for the reasons behind the preservation of a housing community’s current architectural status against the urban transformation movements affecting the entire city

What Social Scientists Have Learned About Civic Education: A Review of the Literature

Dropping off the bandwagon: a puzzle for the resource mobilisation perspective on civil society contestation networks

Social Capital: The Crucial Link for Optimizing the Impact of Human Capital

Making Democracy Work: Formal Institutions and Culture in Rural China∗

Catalysts of connection. The role of digital information and communication technology in fostering neighbourhood social cohesion: A systematic review of empirical findings

The political process in nations: Civil society participation and income inequality

Community and informal institutions in reforms under crises: the odyssey of a 350-year-old functionally credible water commons