Abstract:1: Monitoring small, mobile organisms is crucial for science and conservation, but is technically challenging. Migratory birds are prime examples, often undertaking nocturnal movements of thousands of kilometres over inaccessible and inhospitable geography. Acoustic technology could facilitate widespread monitoring of nocturnal bird migration with minimal human effort. Acoustics complements existing monitoring methods by providing information about individual behaviour and species identities, something generally not possible with tools such as radar. However, the need for expert humans to review audio and identify vocalizations are challenges to application and development of acoustic technologies. 2: Here, we describe an automated acoustic monitoring pipeline that combines acoustic sensors with machine listening software (BirdVoxDetect). We monitor four months of autumn migration in the northeastern United States with five acoustic sensors, extracting nightly estimates of nocturnal calling activity of 14 migratory species with distinctive flight calls. We examine the ability of acoustics to inform two important facets of bird migration: (1) the quantity of migrating birds aloft and (2) the migration timing of individual species. We validate these data with contemporaneous observations from Doppler radars and a large community of citizen scientists, from which we derive independent measures of migration passage and timing. 3: Together, acoustic and weather data produced accurate estimates of the number of actively migrating birds detected with radar. A model combining acoustic data, weather, and seasonal timing explained 75% of variation in radar‐derived migration intensity. This model outperformed models that lacked acoustic data. Including acoustics in the model decreased prediction error by 33%. A model with only acoustic information outperformed a model comprising weather and date (57% vs. 48% variation explained, respectively). 4: Acoustics also successfully measured migration phenology: species‐specific timing estimated by acoustic sensors explained 71% of variation in timing derived from citizen science observations. 5: Synthesis and applications. Our results demonstrate that cost‐effective acoustic sensors can monitor bird migration at species resolution at the landscape scale and should be an integral part of management toolkits. Acoustic monitoring presents distinct advantages over radar and human observation, especially in inaccessible and inhospitable locations, and requires significantly less expense. Managers should consider using acoustic tools for monitoring avian movements and identifying and understanding dangerous situations for birds. These recommendations apply to a variety of conservation and policy applications, including mitigating the impacts of light pollution, siting energy infrastructure (e.g. wind turbines), and reducing collisions with structures and aircraft.

Acoustic species identification: When biology collides with physics

Study on Echo Features and Classification Methods of Fish Species.

What acoustic telemetry can and cannot tell us about fish biology

Acoustic density estimation of dense fish shoals

Taxonomical classification of reef fish with broadband backscattering models and machine learning approaches

Ecological inferences about marine mammals from passive acoustic data

Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics

Acoustic sampling and signal processing near the seabed: the deadzone revisited

Acoustic seabed classification: current practice and future directions

Acoustic features as a tool to visualize and explore marine soundscapes: Applications illustrated using marine mammal passive acoustic monitoring datasets

Acoustic scattering from a water-filled cylindrical shell: measurements, modeling, and interpretation.

Introduction to the special issue on fish bioacoustics: Hearing and sound communication

North Sea soundscapes from a fish perspective: Directional patterns in particle motion and masking potential from anthropogenic noise

Modelling approaches to multibeam echosounders for sound field characterizationa)

Ray representation of sound scattering by weakly scattering deformed fluid cylinders: Simple physics and application to zooplankton

Recommendations on bioacoustical metrics relevant for regulating exposure to anthropogenic underwater sounda)

Compensating for the effects of site and equipment variation on delphinid species identification from their echolocation clicks

Schrödinger's fish: Examining the robotic observer effect on pelagic animals

Fish sounds: towards the evaluation of marine acoustic biodiversity through data-driven audio source separation

Automated acoustic monitoring captures timing and intensity of bird migration

Individual identification in acoustic recordings