Youth and Precarious Work
Ian C. Smith,F. Sidoti,E. Speers,Noha Shawki,R. D. Wood,Philip Hammiala,N. Stekelenburg,David Adès,A. Murgia,G. Morgan,Pariece Nelligan,C. Walker,D. Tweedie,Philip Hammial,Michele Seminara,S. Chan,Jane Downing,A. Coleman,B. Hindess
2015-10-01
Abstract:It is now commonplace to observe that the transitions from youth to adulthood (Furlong and Cartmel 1997; Stokes and Wyn 2007) have become more fragmented, and even to question the value of these categories for understanding the life course. In the Fordist era of the mid-twentieth century, working people could base their life plans - including in personal relationships - on the expectation of relatively secure employment contracts with large stable employers. Under such social arrangements, education and work corresponded with distinct and sequential periods of life, and any further training came on-the-job mostly at employers' expense (Watson et al. 2003). But in contemporary post-industrial societies fewer workers are now employed by large companies/ organisations, and in the course of their working lives, children will almost certainly have more jobs than their parents. The short shelf life of skills and occupations means that, as politicians and employers keep telling us, training/education is a lifelong challenge. Among the variety of risks and calculations associated with late modernity (Giddens 1991) is what we might call credential anxiety - deciding whether to invest time and - in an increasing user-pays environment - money in various forms of post-school education/training.The organisations/institutions that might have provided the foundations for political opposition to precariousness have been eroded. The decline in trade union membership, for example, is well documented; in Australia only 15% of workers are paid-up members (Kelly 2015). But also important is the ideological shift towards neoliberalism, which has undermined the collective institutions of social democracy and made individuals responsible for managing their lives and careers. While, as some commentators have observed (Leadbeater 2000), the new economy has liberated workers from the Fordist script of the job-for-life, the price of this is high. Precariousness and individualisation have accentuated existing social inequalities. In the new economy, social capital assumes greater significance as more 'fast' jobs are allocated by word of mouth, rather than through a formal advertisement and selection process. So those with family contacts, who went to the right school and speak and dress in the right way are able to go further.Those from socially disadvantaged backgrounds lack the networks and the cultural capital required to make it through. With family money, middle-class kids can tread water in precarious labour markets for longer. Their parents can help them with deposits for home loans and they will accommodate them for longer in the family home. The idea of inter-generational inequity recurs frequently in media reports on the distribution of wealth in the West. However, this idea conceals the larger situation; in situations of mass youth precariousness, intergenerational transfers are much more important than ever. The plight of the youthful 'precariat' (Standing, 2011) is compounded by the geography of the new economy. Despite the growing importance of digital communications, and the promise that relations of propinquity will become less and less important to economic activity, there has ironically been an increasing centralisation of employment opportunities (Sassen 1991) and of the networks through which many such opportunities are allocated. This activity is often located in places where gentrification has made housing so expensive that it is out of reach to all but the professional elite. So in addition to working long hours many young workers have to commute considerable distances from relatively affordable housing to their place of work.But the most corrosive effect of precariousness is psycho-social. It has undermined the very conditions not only on which we plan for the future but also on how we compose a coherent narrative of self. Those who are tossed around by the vagaries of skittish labour markets will struggle to unite the vocational fragments (Sennett 1998). …
Sociology