Abstract:The purpose of this study was to examine the potential interdependent relationships between religiosity, conservatism, social value orientation and philanthropy. Participants included members of four religious institutions. A non-experimental survey design was used gather information. Subjects were given a hypothetical task related to social value orientation, two scales of measurement related to religiosity and philanthropy and asked to self-identifr their political orientation. Chi Square analysis identified a significant relationship between political orientation and social value orientation. A correlation was found between religiosity and philanthropy within the liberal sample, rather than in the suspected conservative sample. Additionally, a one-way analysis of variance revealed that there were no significant differences in attitudes towards philanthropy. Results provide support for models suggesting that religion promotes competing psychological stances: conservatism and a prosocial value orientation. The Pew Research Center (2012) recently reported that America's politics fall along partisan lines and are more polarized than at any other time in the previous 25 years. This sentiment is often alluded to in today's media, and the 2012 Presidential election evidenced this as well. Each candidate emphasized that the 2012 election was about the fundamentally different paths on which America could be lead. A primary way that the policies of conservatives and liberals differ is the degree to which they facilitate government intervention in socioeconomic matters. Generally, the conservative base supports policies that stress minimal intervention. What is striking about this is that a core component of the conservative base is largely religious. While religious institutions typically promote prosocial attitudes and action, such as helping the poor, conservative economics reduce the amount of spending on social welfare programs. It seems that in regard to helping those of a lower socioeconomic class, political conservatism violates one of the primary tenets of most churches, yet many religious individuals continue to identify with conservative ideology (Guth, Kellstedt, Smidt, & Green, 2006; Kelly & Morgan, 2008; Layman & Carmines, 1997). This apparent contradiction was addressed extensively in a study conducted by Malka, Soto, Cohen, & Miller (2011). Their research was based on the hypothesis that religion has competing psychological influences on social welfare attitudes, and findings suggested that religiosity was a predictor for both opposition and approval of social welfare programs. It was argued that there are two pathways by which an individual can be influenced: one stressing conservatism, the other stressing prosocial values. Although specific determinants leading an individual to either pathway were not identified, the conservative pathway can be understood by recognizing that many politically conservative messages are those that are supported by the church. For instance, stances on sexuality, abortion and traditional families are topics that are central to each institution's identity. In relation to these stances, opposition to social welfare was hypothesized to be connected to one's need to be consistent in his or her world views. Malka et al. (2011) state that when a religious individual's views are aligned with the conservative end of politics, he may, in turn, "drag" his view of social welfare toward the conservative side so that his

Religious Prosociality and Morality Across Cultures

RETRACTED: the Negative Association Between Religiousness and Children’s Altruism Across the World

Intuitive moral bias favors the religiously faithful

Religiosity predicts prosociality, especially when measured by self-report: A meta-analysis of almost 60 years of research.

The Development of Generosity and Moral Cognition Across Five Cultures.

Beyond borders: The moderating role of cultural religiosity in the relationship between moral circle and generosity

Moralistic gods, supernatural punishment and the expansion of human sociality

The influence of religious faith on prosocial intentions and behaviors. Findings from a cross-sectional survey among young adults voluntarily working in social contexts

The Effects of Buddhist Religiosity and Aspects on Prosociality

Religious affiliations of Chinese people and prosocial behavior: evidence from field experiments

A study of religiosity and conservatismin relation to social value orientation and philanthropy

Playing for God’s Team: The Influence of Belief in the Supernatural on Perceptions of Religious, Spiritual, and Natural Cues

Unveiling Unexpected Selfless Collectivism: Exploring Variances in Moral Beliefs Across Cultural Values

Religious Affiliation, Religious Attendance, and Participation in Social Change Organizations

Understanding prosocial and antisocial behaviours: The roles of self‐focused and other‐focused motivational orientations

Cross-cultural variations in Big Five relationships with religiosity: A sociocultural motives perspective.

Exploring causality from observational data: An example assessing whether religiosity promotes cooperation

Religions grow in tighter (vs. looser) cultures: Two studies of inter & intra-country data

Religious Identity, Between-Group Effects and Prosocial Behavior: Evidence from a Field Experiment in China

Agency-communion and interest in prosocial behavior: social motives for assimilation and contrast explain sociocultural inconsistencies

Exploring Repressive Suffering Construal As a Function of Collectivism and Social Morality