Abstract:Effective and adaptable biosecurity and surveillance systems are crucial for maintaining and increasing Australia's competitive advantages in international markets, and for the production of high quality, safe animal products. These systems are continuously strengthened by ongoing government and industry investment. However, a better understanding of evolving disease risks and the country's capacity to respond to these risks is needed. This study developed a vulnerability framework based on characteristics and behaviours of livestock producers that impact exposure and response capacity to an emergency animal disease (EAD) outbreak among beef producers in Australia, with a focus on foot and mouth disease (FMD). This framework articulated producer vulnerability typologies to better inform surveillance resource allocation and future research direction. A cross-sectional study of beef producers in Australia was conducted to gather information on producers' demographics, husbandry characteristics, biosecurity and animal health management practices and beliefs, including those specific to FMD risk and response capacity. A Bayesian Network (BN) model was developed from the vulnerability framework, to investigate the complex interrelationships between variables and identify producer typologies. A total of 375 usable responses were obtained from the cross-sectional study. Regarding EAD exposure, producers implemented appropriate biosecurity practices for incoming stock, such as isolation (72.0 %), inspection for disease (88.7 %) and the use of vendor declarations (78.5 %); however, other biosecurity practices were limited, such as restriction of visitor access, visitor biosecurity requirements or feral animal control. In relation to response capacity, a moderate uptake of practices was observed. Whilst daily or weekly visual inspection of animals was reported by most producers (90.1 %), physical inspection was less frequent. Most producers would call a private veterinarian in response to unusual signs of disease in their cattle; however, over 40 % of producers did not cite calling a government veterinarian as a priority action. Most producers believe an FMD outbreak would have extremely serious consequences; however, their level of concern was moderate and their confidence in identifying FMD symptoms was low. The BN analysis identified six vulnerability typologies, with three levels of exposure (high, moderate, low) and two levels of response capacity (high, low), as described by producer demographics and practices. The model identified property size, number of cattle and exposure variables as the most influential to the overall producer vulnerability. Results from this study can inform how to best use current biosecurity and surveillance resources and identify where opportunities exist for improving Australia's preparedness for future EAD incursions.

How do resources influence control measures during a simulated outbreak of foot and mouth disease in Australia?

The economic benefits of targeted response strategies against foot-and-mouth disease in Australia

Market Impact of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Control Strategies: A UK Case Study

Options for managing animal welfare on intensive pig farms confined by movement restrictions during an outbreak of foot and mouth disease

Modelling the field personnel resources to control foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks in New Zealand.

Modelling vaccination strategies against foot-and-mouth disease

Evaluation of the Control Strategy for the 2010 Foot-and-Mouth Disease Outbreak in Japan Using Disease Simulation

Modeling target-density-based cull strategies to contain foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks

Evaluation of foot and mouth disease control measures: Simulating two endemic areas of Thailand

Impacts of constrained culling and vaccination on control of foot and mouth disease in near-endemic settings: a pair approximation model

Modeling the Effects of Multiple Intervention Strategies on Controlling Foot-and-Mouth Disease

Modeling foot-and-mouth disease dissemination in Brazil and evaluating the effectiveness of control measures

Evaluation of the benefit of emergency vaccination in a foot-and-mouth disease free country with low livestock density

The foot-and-mouth epidemic in Great Britain: pattern of spread and impact of interventions

Allocating Limited Surveillance Effort for Outbreak Detection of Endemic Foot and Mouth Disease

Mathematical model of the 2010 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Japan and evaluation of control measures

Inferring transmission routes for foot-and-mouth disease virus within a cattle herd using approximate Bayesian computation

Potential impact of species and livestock density on the epidemic size and effectiveness of control measures for foot-and-mouth disease in Japan

Assessing the effectiveness of environmental sampling for surveillance of foot-and-mouth disease virus in a cattle herd

Controlling disease outbreaks in wildlife using limited culling: modelling classical swine fever incursions in wild pigs in Australia

Understanding the vulnerability of beef producers in Australia to an FMD outbreak using a Bayesian Network predictive model