Abstract:Addressing the challenge of toxic language in online discussions is crucial for the development of effective toxicity detection models. This pioneering work focuses on addressing imbalanced datasets in toxicity detection by introducing a novel approach to augment toxic language data. We create a balanced dataset by instructing fine-tuning of Large Language Models (LLMs) using Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF). Recognizing the challenges in collecting sufficient toxic samples from social media platforms for building a balanced dataset, our methodology involves sentence-level text data augmentation through paraphrasing existing samples using optimized generative LLMs. Leveraging generative LLM, we utilize the Proximal Policy Optimizer (PPO) as the RL algorithm to fine-tune the model further and align it with human feedback. In other words, we start by fine-tuning a LLM using an instruction dataset, specifically tailored for the task of paraphrasing while maintaining semantic consistency. Next, we apply PPO and a reward function, to further fine-tune (optimize) the instruction-tuned LLM. This RL process guides the model in generating toxic responses. We utilize the Google Perspective API as a toxicity evaluator to assess generated responses and assign rewards/penalties accordingly. This approach guides LLMs through PPO and the reward function, transforming minority class samples into augmented versions. The primary goal of our methodology is to create a balanced and diverse dataset to enhance the accuracy and performance of classifiers in identifying instances from the minority class. Utilizing two publicly available toxic datasets, we compared various techniques with our proposed method for generating toxic samples, demonstrating that our approach outperforms all others in producing a higher number of toxic samples. Starting with an initial 16,225 toxic prompts, our method successfully generated 122,951 toxic samples with a toxicity score exceeding 30%. Subsequently, we developed various classifiers using the generated balanced datasets and applied a cost-sensitive learning approach to the original imbalanced dataset. The findings highlight the superior performance of classifiers trained on data generated using our proposed method. These results highlight the importance of employing RL and a data-agnostic model as a reward mechanism for augmenting toxic data, thereby enhancing the robustness of toxicity detection models.

Protecting marginalized communities by mitigating discrimination in toxic language detection

Empirical Analysis of Multi-Task Learning for Reducing Model Bias in Toxic Comment Detection

On Bias and Fairness in NLP: Investigating the Impact of Bias and Debiasing in Language Models on the Fairness of Toxicity Detection

Mitigating Biases in Toxic Language Detection Through Invariant Rationalization

Developing Linguistic Patterns to Mitigate Inherent Human Bias in Offensive Language Detection

Investigating Bias In Automatic Toxic Comment Detection: An Empirical Study

Handling Bias in Toxic Speech Detection: A Survey

Walking in Others' Shoes: How Perspective-Taking Guides Large Language Models in Reducing Toxicity and Bias

Reward Modeling for Mitigating Toxicity in Transformer-based Language Models

Reading Between the Demographic Lines: Resolving Sources of Bias in Toxicity Classifiers

Mitigating Negative Transfer with Task Awareness for Sexism, Hate Speech, and Toxic Language Detection

Mitigating Racial Biases in Toxic Language Detection with an Equity-Based Ensemble Framework

AugmenToxic: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning to Optimize LLM Instruction Fine-Tuning for Data Augmentation to Enhance Toxicity Detection

Determination of toxic comments and unintended model bias minimization using Deep learning approach

Shielding Google's language toxicity model against adversarial attacks

Fortifying Toxic Speech Detectors Against Veiled Toxicity

Mitigating Biases to Embrace Diversity: A Comprehensive Annotation Benchmark for Toxic Language

Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Models

Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detection

Purging the Poison: A Machine Learning Approach to Filtering Toxic Comments

Reducing Unintended Identity Bias in Russian Hate Speech Detection