Abstract:Objective: The objective of this scoping review was to explore and synthesize the available literature on health research mentorship in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Introduction: Research mentorship is broadly considered a useful strategy to improve research capacities and research outputs. Existing literature and guidance on research mentorship have focused on high-income countries and assumed resource-rich environments. Despite the successful endeavors to improve health research capacity in LMICs, the strategies that work best under different circumstances are poorly understood. There is a need to map and understand the evidence on health research mentorship in the context of LMICs. Inclusion criteria: Sources that reported existing practices, barriers, and mitigation strategies related to health research mentorship in LMICs were included. Methods: We searched for published and unpublished studies and reports written in English, Spanish, or Portuguese. The search strategy was not limited by search dates and the last search was conducted on January 28, 2022. The databases searched included MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and JBI Evidence Synthesis . We also searched for gray literature in a selection of websites and digital repositories. The JBI scoping review methodology was used. Results: A total of 77 studies and reports were included in the review. The majority of the papers were from Africa (n=28). Others were from the Americas (n=7), South East Asia (n=4), East Mediterranean (n=2), and Western Pacific (n=2). The remaining studies were from LMICs that included at least 2 regional offices. Most of the mentorship projects (n=55) were initiated and funded by institutions from high-income countries. The first authors of 41 papers were primarily affiliated with LMICs. The findings were categorized under a description of research mentorship practices, barriers related to research mentorship, and suggested mitigation strategies. Deliverable-driven training using intensive hands-on mentorship and ongoing peer mentorship programs were some of the non-regular, non-institutionalized approaches used to improve research capacity for junior researchers in LMICs. None of the included papers focused on institutional components of research mentorship in LMICs. The barriers to research mentorship activities in LMICs included lack of clarity on mentorship, cultural variations, unbalanced power dynamics, socio-political influences, language barriers, lack of experienced mentors, and limited local funding. Institutionalizing research mentorship, adapting mentoring methodologies relying on local resources, and addressing and respecting diversity in mentorship programs were among the main strategies identified to effectively implement research mentorship in LMICs. Conclusions: Research mentorship initiatives and practices are limited in LMICs. Few available practices have been introduced by researchers and research institutions from high-income countries and those that have are not yet institutionalized. The identified existing practices, barriers, and facilitators on health research mentorship could help the design, implementation, and evaluation of programs to institutionalize health research mentorship in LMICs. Review registration: Open Science Framework osf.io/jqa9z/. Supplemental digital content: A Spanish-language version of the abstract of this review is available as supplemental digital content: http://links.lww.com/SRX/A32.

Mentoring International Research Ethics Trainees: Identifying Best Practices

Training in the art and science of facilitation to scale research mentor training in low and middle income countries

Mentoring up for early career investigators: Empowering mentees to proactively engage in their mentoring relationships

Challenges and Benefits in Designing and Implementing a Team-Based Research Mentorship Experience in Translational Research

Evaluating the Importance of Mentoring in Undergraduate Research Education Programs

Introduction: International Research Ethics Education

Evaluating International Research Ethics Capacity Development: An Empirical Approach

Mentoring future mentors in undergraduate medical education

Introduction: The Fogarty International Research Ethics Education and Curriculum Development Program in Historical Context

A new approach to mentoring for research careers: the National Research Mentoring Network

Health research mentorship in low-income and middle-income countries: a global qualitative evidence synthesis of data from a crowdsourcing open call and scoping review

Institutional Incentives for Mentoring at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and Universities: Associations With Mentors' Perceptions and Time Spent Mentoring

A Bibliometric Analysis of an International Research Ethics Trainee Program

Understanding Successful Mentor-Mentee Relationships in New Faculty Scholars Program

Health research mentorship in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review

Bridging the divide: supporting and mentoring trainees to conceptualize, plan, and integrate engagement of people with lived experience in health research

Understanding mentoring relationships between mentees, peer and senior mentors

Effective and inclusive mentorship in the field of epidemiology

Developing a mentoring program to support the next generation of immunologists

Utilizing mentorship education to promote a culturally responsive research training environment in the biomedical sciences

Mentoring through teamwork: lessons learned