Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block with Different Concentrations and Volumes of Ropivacaine on Functional Recovery in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Observer-Masked, Controlled Trial
Ying Huang,Yao Lu,Jun Wang,Qiang Lu,Hai-Feng Bao,Lang Liu,Chun-Shan Dong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s445000
IF: 2.8319
2024-02-15
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Ying Huang, 1 Yao Lu, 2 Jun Wang, 1 Qiang Lu, 1 Hai-Feng Bao, 1 Lang Liu, 1 Chun-Shan Dong 1 1 Department of Anaesthesiology, Anhui Medical University Third Affiliated Hospital (Hefei First People's Hospital), Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Anaesthesiology, Anhui Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Chun-Shan Dong, Department of Anesthesiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Hefei First People's Hospital), Hefei Huaihe Road No. 390, 230061, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 -13023030292, Email Purpose: The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block provides satisfactory postoperative analgesia without hampering motor function for total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, unexpected motor block has been observed clinically. It is unknown whether this motor block is related to the dose of ropivacaine. We aimed to conduct a prospective randomized trial to test whether reducing the volume or concentration of ropivacaine was better for less motor block after PENG block. Patients and Methods: Ninety-nine patients with fracture or femoral head necrosis scheduled for THA were randomly allocated to receive 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine (Group A), 20 mL 0.25% ropivacaine (Group B), and 10 mL 0.5% ropivacaine (Group C). The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative quadriceps motor block at 6 hours. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of postoperative quadriceps motor block at 0, 12, 24 and 48 hours; pain scores on the numeric rating scale (NRS) at all postoperative time points (0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours); the time to first walk; the incidence of rescue analgesia; side effects such as dizziness, ache, nausea, and vomiting; and patient satisfaction. Results: Compared with Group A, Group C resulted in a lower incidence of quadriceps motor block at 0 hours, 6 hours and 12 hours postoperatively (P < 0.05), while Group B only resulted in a lower incidence of motor block at 12 hours postoperatively (P 0.05). Conclusion: A higher incidence of motor blockade was observed when 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine was administered, which was mainly caused by the excessive volume. Therefore, we recommend performing PENG block with 10 mL 0.5% ropivacaine. Keywords: pericapsular nerve group block, analgesia, motor recovery, ropivacaine Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a widely used method for treating hip fractures and femoral head necrosis. However, acute pain is common and can lead to a series of postoperative complications, such as delirium, reduced patient satisfaction, and decreased functional outcomes. 1–3 Nerve blocks are commonly used for postoperative analgesia, such as femoral nerve block (FNB) and suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SIFIB), but they may result in quadriceps weakness, thereby hindering postoperative mobilization. 4,5 The pericapsular nerve group block (PENG block) was first applied to THA by Girón-Arango et al 6 in 2018, and it provided sufficient analgesic effect without resulting in quadriceps weakness. 6 However, this feature does not seem to be well confirmed in clinical randomized controlled experiments. Studies 7,8 that performed PENG block with local anaesthetic of 20 mL 0.5% and 0.75% reported inadvertent quadriceps weakness. The mechanism of motor block is still unclear. Anatomically, PENG only involves sensitive fibres, 9 so the concentration of local anaesthetic will not affect postoperative quadriceps strength. However, if a mixed nerve such as the femoral nerve (FN) is accidentally blocked with a large volume, the effect of concentration on muscle strength cannot be ignored. Therefore, we must take the local anaesthetic volume and concentration into account for unexpected motor block after PENG block. Our primary objective was to conduct a prospective randomized trial to test whether reducing the volume or concentration of ropivacaine was better for less motor block after PENG block. This was a single-centre, double-blinded, randomized comparative trial conducted at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Hefei First People's Hospital), Hefei, Anhui, China. Before enrolment, the ethics committee of Hefei First People's Hospital approved (approved No. of ethic committee: 2021 (52)) this study, and the study was registered at Clinical Trials prior to commencement (trial registration number: ChiCTR2100052511; principal investigator: Huangying; date of approval: 30/10/20 -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology