STMO-14 Clinical experience of brain tumor surgery using middleware “OPeLiNK”

Yu Fujii,Toshihiro Ogiwara,Tetsuya Goto,Yoshihiro Muragaki,Kazuhiro Hongo,Tetsuyoshi Horiuchi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab159.049
2021-12-01
Abstract:Abstract PURPOSE The removal of brain tumors requires not only imaging information such as MRI and navigation systems, but also a variety of other information such as neurological function and biological information. To integrate this information, a novel operating room, “Smart Cyber Operating Theater (SCOT)”, which connects the medical devices in the operating room via a network has developed. In this SCOT, the intraoperative information is time-synchronized, recorded, and stored by the middleware “OPeLiNK”. Clinical experience of brain tumor surgery using OPeLiNK in our institute is reported. Methods Brain tumor surgeries performed at SCOT, which had been started since July 2018, was enrolled. In all surgeries intraoperative information was integrated by OPeLiNK. Surgical procedure was discussed between main surgeon and supervising surgeon in the Strategy Desk through OPeLiNK intraoperatively, if necessary. Clinical and radiological data from patients who underwent resection at SCOT were analyzed retrospectively. Results Sixty patients were involved. Histopathological diagnosis was glioma in 29 patients, pituitary adenoma in 29 patients, acoustic tumor in 1 patient and intravascular lymphoma in 1 patient. Intraoperative discussion with Strategy Desk through OPeLiNK was useful for not only surgeons but also for medical staff in operation room. Advice for extent of resection and craniotomy from Strategy Desk was conducted by OPeLiNK using conversation and drawing. Intraoperative comment was useful for postoperative review. OPeLiNK, which display multiple intraoperative information, was also used at postoperative conference. Conclusion We have reported clinical experience with OPeLiNK for brain tumor surgery in our institute. OPeLiNK was useful for not only sharing intraoperative information with doctors outside the operation room but also postoperative review and education for young doctors.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?