Abstract:Background: The overarching interest in this project is to gain knowledge about what happens in the meeting between group work and assessment in pedagogical practice. There seems to be a tension between the demand for individual assessment of students' knowledge and abilities and the demand to teach students collaboration abilities through group work. A previous study concerning teachers' management of group work as a classroom activity reveals that assessment is a highly relevant factor. In addition, teachers seem to experience difficulties and acknowledge some challenges and problems as regards assessing students working in a group. Purpose: The main purpose of this study was to obtain not only increased knowledge of how teachers assess individual learning occurring in group work, but also explore how teachers manage the emerging challenges. An additional purpose was, with support from previous research within the area, to provide a means of handling these challenges. Sample: Data were gathered by means of three focus group interviews. The informants were 11 teachers. They taught students aged 11–16 years in compulsory education in Sweden during the spring of 2009. Design and method: Grounded theory methodology, together with the theoretical perspective of symbolic interactionism, was used to increase comprehension of the teachers' problems when assessing learning outcome in group work. The transcribed discussions in the focus groups were analysed by means of theoretical sampling, and a number of categories emerged. Results: The results show that teachers primarily used informal approaches when they assessed students' knowledge and abilities in group work situations. The teachers used a general level when talking about assessment and the descriptions about what they assess were vague. In the teachers' accounts of what is assessed it is possible to distinguish both the product and the process carried out at an individual as well as at a group level. Furthermore, the results reveal two different assessment strategies, that is how the assessment was carried out – by teachers (from outside the group) or by students (from inside the group). Additionally, the results disclosed that the teachers have difficulties in concretising and verbalising what and how they assess. The teachers also experienced uncertainty and contradictory demands concerning assessment of students in group work. They were concerned about this difficulty. Conclusion: The teachers were of the opinion that group work is used foremost to develop group work abilities and not as a means of acquiring academic knowledge. This influenced the teachers' mode of using assessment, that is, they focussed on assessing the collaborative abilities. This article elucidates some of the teachers' problems concerning assessment in group work and some pedagogical implications based on empirical findings. Research-based theories and models within these areas could increase teachers' confidence, which, in turn, could increase good practice, their ability to use group work as a mode and also their competence in assessment.

Learning specific content in technology education: learning study as a collaborative method in Swedish preschool class using hands-on material

Examining how technology is presented and understood in technology education: a pilot study in a preschool class

Characterizations of preschool technology education: analyses of seven individual preschool teachers’ and childcare attendants’ descriptions of their teaching

Technology education in preschool: providing opportunities for children to use artifacts and to create

Cross-curricular CLIL projects in Swedish middle school

Symposium 1: Interactive and action-oriented instruction for a digital era

Enhancing pedagogical content knowledge for STEM teaching of teacher candidates through lesson study

Designing with Young Children: Lessons Learned from a Co-creation of a Technology-Enhanced Playful Learning Environment

Teaching and learning in age-homogeneous groups versus mixed-age groups in the preschool – the Swedish example

Building a web in science instruction: using multiple resources in a Swedish multilingual middle school class

Food as a tool for learning in everyday activities at preschool – an exploratory study from Sweden

Experiences of educational content in Swedish technical vocational education: Examples from the energy and industry programmes

The use of digital technology for differentiation of teaching in early school years

Teaching with technology in higher education: understanding conceptual change and development in practice

School Subject Paradigms and Teaching Practice in the Screen Culture: Art, Music and the Mother Tongue (Swedish) under Pressure

Embracing Digital Technology in Science Classrooms—Secondary School Teachers’ Enacted Teaching and Reflections on Practice

Spanish and Swedish teachers’ perspective of teaching STEM and robotics in preschool – results from the botSTEM project

CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) for Pre-service Teachers of Science: Scaffolding in Lesson Planning

Factors influencing Swedish grades 4–6 technology teachers’ choice of teaching and learning material in programming education

Assessment of students' learning when working in groups

The comprehending teacher: scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL)