Equalising opportunities in health through educational policy

Andrew M. Jones,John E. Roemer,Pedro Rosa Dias
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-014-0793-z
2014-02-06
Social Choice and Welfare
Abstract:Despite the growing prominence of theoretical analysis of inequality of opportunity over the past twenty years, empirical work towards the normative evaluation of real-world policies has been minimal. This paper seeks to address this issue. It proposes a normative framework to model the influence of educational policy on health outcomes, grounded in Roemer’s model of equality of opportunity. We apply this model to the National Child Development Study cohort, who, since their schooling lay within the transition period of the comprehensive education reform in England and Wales, attended different types of secondary school. We use this reform in two ways: first, to evaluate the health outcomes of different educational policies under different normative principles; second, to simulate counterfactual distributions of health outcomes by neutralising the different channels through which early life circumstances influence health. Evidence on the comparative performance of the two educational systems is mixed, suggesting that the opportunity-enhancing effects of the comprehensive reform were, at best, modest in terms of adult health. For some of the health outcomes considered, this leads to a convergence between the policy recommendations made by the two ethical principles of equality of opportunity and utilitarianism, while for others, the two principles diverge in their evaluation.
economics,social sciences, mathematical methods
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **Normative evaluation of equalizing health opportunities through educational policies**. Specifically, the authors hope to bridge the gap between theoretical analysis and real - world policy evaluation, especially regarding how to use educational policies to reduce unequal opportunities in the health field. ### Specific description of the problem 1. **Construction of the theoretical framework**: - The paper proposes a normative framework based on Roemer (2002)'s equality of opportunity model for analyzing the impact of educational policies on health outcomes. - This model aims to measure and evaluate the long - term impact of different educational policies on health outcomes, especially their role in reducing unequal opportunities. 2. **Application of empirical research**: - The study uses data from the National Child Development Study (NCDS) in the UK, which covers a generation born in 1958. They were at a critical period of UK educational reform when receiving education. - By comparing health outcomes under different educational policies, the study attempts to evaluate whether these policies have indeed improved equality of opportunity and to what extent they have improved health outcomes. 3. **Innovations in policy evaluation**: - **Path analysis**: The paper distinguishes different influence paths of early environmental factors on health through education, lifestyle, and socioeconomic status. - **Counterfactual analysis**: By simulating the influence of different paths, researchers can evaluate the specific contribution of each path to health outcomes. - **Normative evaluation**: The paper not only evaluates the average improvement of health outcomes from a utilitarian perspective but also from the perspective of equality of opportunity, exploring policy recommendations under different ethical principles. ### Main objectives - **Evaluate the long - term impact of educational policies on health outcomes**: In particular, whether the comprehensive school reform implemented in the UK in the 1960s has successfully reduced unequal opportunities in the health field. - **Compare the policy effects under different ethical principles**: The study finds that for some health outcomes, the utilitarian and equality - of - opportunity principles lead to similar policy recommendations; while for other health outcomes, the evaluations of these two principles are divergent. Through these analyses, the paper hopes to provide a more solid theoretical and empirical basis for future education and health policies, thereby better promoting social fairness and the improvement of health levels.