Abstract:Academic abstract: Advantaged group allies have multiple motives for supporting equality, raising questions about their sincerity. We draw upon the covariation model of attributions to explain how disadvantaged group members make attributions about whether advantaged group "allies" are sincerely motivated to empower the disadvantaged group. We propose an Attribution-Identity Model of Sincerity (AIMS) which posits that disadvantaged group members view advantaged group members as sincere allies when they support equality in the presence of inhibitory causes and in the absence of facilitative causes, exceed expectations for the advantaged group, and provide support across time and contexts. Furthermore, those who identify strongly with their disadvantaged group and perceive intergroup inequality as illegitimate are most motivated to ascertain the sincerity of advantaged group members' allyship. AIMS suggests how members of disadvantaged groups seek to maximize benefits and minimize risks of advantaged group members' allyship. Public abstract: Advantaged group members (e.g., men, White Americans) can act as allies for disadvantaged groups (e.g., women, Americans belonging to minoritized racial groups), but members of disadvantaged groups sometimes have reason to question whether their motives are sincere. We argue that members of disadvantaged groups view advantaged group allies as more sincere when they support equality when they do not stand to benefit from it and even when they stand to lose. We also argue that members of disadvantaged groups view advantaged group allies as more sincere when their support for equality goes beyond expectations for their advantaged group, consistently over time, and is not limited to particular situations, forms, or contexts. Members of disadvantaged groups like sincere allies, want to work with them, and feel safe around them. Sincere allies also serve as moral exemplars to other members of advantaged groups.

Conceptual and empirical strengths of the authentic/hubristic model of pride.

Conceptual and empirical challenges to the "Authentic" versus "Hubristic" model of pride

Further challenges to the "Authentic"/"Hubristic" model of pride: conceptual clarifications and new evidence

The Authentic and Hubristic Pride scales do not validly assess the two-facet model of pride: Time to rewind and reboot with new measures.

Arrogant or self-confident? The use of contextual knowledge to differentiate hubristic and authentic pride from a single nonverbal expression

Prestige and Dominance: How eWOM Differs Between Consumers High in Authentic and Hubristic Pride

MEASURING PRIDE 1 The German Standard and Short Authentic and Hubristic Pride Scales: Psychometric Properties, Validity Testing, Self-Other Agreement, and Linguistic Correlates

Authentic and hubristic pride: Differential effects on delay of gratification.

The Viability and Validity of Authentic and Hubristic Pride: Commentary on Dickens and

Evaluating experimental methods to manipulate authentic vs. hubristic pride: Four pilot studies

Pride and moral disengagement: associations among comparison-based pride, moral disengagement, and unethical decision-making

"My Aim Is True": An Attribution-Identity Model of Ally Sincerity

Pride or empathy? Exploring effective CSR communication strategies on social media

Cross-cultural regularities in the cognitive architecture of pride

Who expresses their pride when? The regulation of pride expressions as a function of self-monitoring and social context

The importance of being humble: A meta-analysis and incremental validity analysis of the relationship between honesty-humility and job performance.

Hubristic pride & prejudice: The effects of hubristic pride on negative word-of-mouth

Awe motivates authentic-self pursuit via self-transcendence: Implications for prosociality.

Displaying pride: Variation by social context, ethnic heritage, and gender?

Toward a measure of brand pride: scale development and validation

Do People Embrace Praise Even When They Feel Unworthy? A Review of Critical Tests of Self-Enhancement Versus Self-Verification