Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal Intensity Ratio Measurements in the Evaluation of Multifidus Muscle Injury and Atrophy Relative to That of Histological Examinations

Hu Zhi-Jun,Xu Wen-Bin,Chen Shuai,Zhou Zhi-Jie,Zhao Feng-Dong,Yu Xiao-Jing,Wang Ji-Ying,Han Li-Li,Jiang Feng,Fu Guo-Xiang,Wu Dan-Ju,Fan Shun-Wu,Fang Xiang-Qian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000286
IF: 3.241
2014-05-01
Spine
Abstract:STUDY DESIGN: A matched-pairs animal study.OBJECTIVE: To confirm the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a means of evaluating edema and fat degeneration of the multifidus muscle by comparing measurements made using MRI with those made using histological examination.SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: MRI is considered a reliable means of evaluating multifidus muscle edema and fat degeneration. However, it is not clear whether its results are always consistent with histological findings.METHODS: Models of different degrees of multifidus injury were created at the L2-L3, L3-L4, and L4-L5 disc levels in 56 New Zealand white rabbits. These were divided into 4 groups and subjected to different processes: sham surgery, dissection and stripping of the multifidus, crushing of the muscle lasting 1 hour, and crushing of the muscle lasting 2 hours. Two rabbits per group were examined at each of the indicated points in time. Multifidus edema was assessed using fat-suppressed T2 signal intensity ratio of gross multifidus to psoas (T2R) on MRI bilaterally, wet weight and wet:dry weight ratio on the left side (edema-left), and visual edema score on the right side (edema-right). Muscle fat degeneration was detected bilaterally using the T1 signal intensity ratio of gross multifidus to psoas with MRI (T1R) and visual fat degeneration score (fat score) with histology.RESULTS: Pearson correlation coefficient analyses showed significant correlations (P < 0.001) between left T2R and edema-left (r = 0.927), right T2R and edema-right (r = 0.868), and T1R and fat score (r = 0.804). A paired t test demonstrated no significant differences between MRI measurements and histological changes (P = 0.999, 1.000, and 0.998). Bland-Altman plots also depicted good agreement between MRI measurements and histological changes (limits of agreement: left multifidus edema, ± 0.75; right multifidus edema, ± 1.01; fat degeneration, ± 1.23).CONCLUSION: The MRI technique is an accuracy means of evaluating multifidus muscle injury and atrophy.
clinical neurology,orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?