Abstract:Abstract The patent assertion entity (PAE) which known as “the world, particularly severe impact in the US Specifically, in 2013, the report entitled “Patent Assertion and US Innovation” issued by the National Economic Council and Council of Economic Advisers of the US clearly reflected the significant harm of patent assertion toward the economic development of the country. Moreover, the Congress of the United States planned to reconsider the Innovation Act for combating PAEs at the beginning of May. The ongoing discussion in the Congress implies that analyzing the 2015 proposed Innovation Act is important for finding appropriate solutions to solve the remaining problem regarding the abuse of patent litigation in the US, specifically, Patent Trolling activity costs the US economy billions of dollars per year. The IT industry is the main target of patent trollers, briefly, due to the standard for considering the eligibility criteria for a software patent is still weak. Admittedly, many legal scholars believe that the proposed bill will be the significant tool for solving the abuse of patent litigation. For this reason, this research will analyze the major provisions in the proposed bill. Additionally, related cases in the US also will be addressed in this research, for instance, the case between Octane Fitness, LLC and ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. which will be discussed herein. This paper will define the concept of the patent assertion or patent troll and examine the relationship with IT industry. The paper will then clarify the significant role of the Innovation Act 2015 in the patent assertion. Further, this thesis will compare the major provisions of the Innovation Bill 2015 by separating into five main issues with the regulatory framework in Japan and Taiwan, study the rules which were laid down in the landmark cases to understand the court interpretation and propose the suggestion for selected countries to address aforementioned problem. In other words, an analysis of the Patent Assertion Entities situation in Japan and Taiwan will be conducted focusing on the regulatory framework for preventing patent troll and its activities because Japanese and Taiwanese IT Industry normally be targeted by foreign patent trollers. This situation led to the defensive measures issued by the Japanese and Taiwanese government which will be addressed in this paper. A comparative study of the Innovation bill and the domestic laws of Taiwan, Japan, and related factors will be analyzed herein.

Comparative Perspectives on Specialised Intellectual Property Courts: Understanding Japan's Intellectual Property High Court Through the Lens of the US Federal Circuit

Legal Research on the Abuse of Patent Litigation and the Defensive Measures for the Japanese and Taiwanese IT Industry

Technology Strategy Revealed: Patterns and Influences of Patent-Licensing Behaviour in Japanese Firms.

Intellectual Property Investment at the International Court of Justice After Certain Iranian Assets

Critical Analysis of Liability of Internet Service Providers for Indirect Patent Infringement

Intellectual property judicial protection, innovation factor input, and corporate innovation: Evidence from the establishment of intellectual property courts in China

Study on the International Jurisdiction of Litigations regarding Intellectual Property Right (IPR) in China: Focusing on the 2024 Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China

Shepard’s Validation of Antitrust Relief Framework on Patent Infringement of Novartis’ Cancer Drug Using Genomic Architectures of Legal Literature Based on UK Intellectual Property Law

Competition policy in patent cases and antitrust

Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Protection in Indonesia and Japan

How Fair is Patent Litigation in China? Evidence from the Beijing Courts

The anti-suit injunctions in patent litigation in China: what role for judicial self-restraint?

Torts and intellectual property in Industry 4.0: a comparative study of Chinese and American jurisprudence

Patent Enforcement: A Comparative Review Preventing Patent Trolling in Europe

Development of Hosting ISPs’ Secondary Liability for Primary Copyright Infringement in China – As Compared to the US and German Routes

Sharpening a biotech patent through methods claims under the litigation strategy of induced infringement: a message from the US Federal Circuit full court decision

Analysis of Enforcement Mechanism of Section 337 of the US Tariff Act Through Perspectives in Law and Economics

Divergence and Convergence of Royalty Determinations between Compulsory Licensing under the TRIPS Agreement and Ongoing Royalties as an Equitable Remedy

The trend in patent infringement litigation against generic drugs or biosimilars in Japan

Study on the Injunction System of China's Standard Essential Patent Litigation