Abstract:Mental arithmetic and estimating number position on the number-line are proven predictors of success in mathematics education, and tap on the basic properties of numerical representations and processes: spatial organization and scaling. However, little is known about the interdependences between these abilities in the preschool period, when the child uses an approximate numerical representation and only acquires the symbolic system. We tested 119 preschoolers aged 3–7 with two non-symbolic arithmetic tasks (±1 and ± 5), symbolic ±1 arithmetic, and non-symbolic and symbolic number-line estimation in 1–9 range. Some form of operational momentum indicating the use of spatial processing appeared in all arithmetic tasks, partly replicating previous studies, however these effects were not correlated across tasks, and only the symbolic arithmetic correlated with number line estimation (nonsymbolic and symbolic). We hypothesize that mental arithmetic involves spatial processing, but scale and spatial arrangement are not inherent properties of number representation but task-specific constructions. Educational relevance statement In our research, we dealt with the performance of mental arithmetic and estimating the position of a number on a number-line in both non-symbolic (sets of dots) and symbolic (Arabic numerals) versions in children aged 3–7. We were more interested in specific biases than accuracy in completing tasks - the logarithmic scaling of the number line, and tendencies to overestimate/underestimate the result in addition/subtraction (so called "magnitude operational momentum") or linking addition with shifting attention to the right and subtraction to the left ("directional operational momentum"). Such biases, and the relation between them and the accuracy measures in the given task, may shed light on the most basic numerical representations and processes in children, and in particular the spatial properties of the mental representation of number and the use of "recycled" spatial attention processes for its processing. Understanding such basic representations and processes is crucial to planning early math education. Our results showed that in preschoolers, new symbolic representations of number link to more primitive, non-symbolic ones, and that mapping number to space to adapt spatial attention processes for number processing may be crucial for early numerical development.

Symbolic Number Abilities Predict Later Approximate Number System Acuity in Preschool Children

Interrelations Between Acuity of the Approximate Number System and Symbolic Skills in Preschool Children

Symbolic Magnitude Understanding Predicts Preschoolers’ Later Addition Skills

Developmental Trajectories of Numerical Magnitude Representations of Fractions and Decimals.

Neural evidence of core foundations and conceptual change in preschool numeracy

Bidirectional, Longitudinal Associations Between Math Ability and Approximate Number System Precision in Childhood

Why numerical symbols count in the development of mathematical skills: evidence from brain and behavior

Symbolic Numerical Magnitude Processing Is as Important to Arithmetic as Phonological Awareness Is to Reading

Basic Number Knowledge Predicts Later Phonological Processing in Kindergarten Children

Kindergartners' fluent processing of symbolic numerical magnitude is predicted by their cardinal knowledge and implicit understanding of arithmetic 2years earlier

Children’s Non-symbolic and Symbolic Numerical Representations and Their Associations with Mathematical Ability

The integration of symbolic and non-symbolic representations of exact quantity in preschool children

The Relationship Between the Approximate Number System and Mathematical Abilities: Evidence from Developmental Research

Numerical development in preschool: Examining potential mediators of children’s approximate number system and mathematics achievement.

Numbers, space, and spatial attention: Operational momentum in non-symbolic and symbolic mental arithmetic, and number-line estimation in preschool children

How do symbolic and non-symbolic spatial-numerical associations develop? Evidence from the parity judgment task and the magnitude comparison task

Automatic Non-Symbolic Numerosity Processing In Preschoolers

The Role of Approximate Number System in Different Mathematics Skills Across Grades

Differential contributions of cognitive precursors to symbolic versus non-symbolic numeracy in young Chinese children

Neural representational similarity between symbolic and non‐symbolic quantities predicts arithmetic skills in childhood but not adolescence

Number Sense Predicts Arithmetic Competence in Young Chinese Children: the Role of Visual Spatial Skills and Inhibitory Control