Abstract:Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of multimodal analgesia in patients with end-stage head and neck cancer in open gastrostomy surgery. Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial. From June to December 2023, 50 patients with end-stage head and neck cancer who underwent elective open gastrostomy surgery in Beijing Tongren Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University were prospectively selected. The patients were divided into multimodal analgesia group and local anesthesia group using the random number table method according to different anesthesia methods, with 25 cases in each group. In multimodal analgesia group, a multimodal analgesia regimen was adopted: ultrasound-guided abdominal wall nerve block (rectus sheath block and transverse abdominis plane block)+intravenous injection of oxycodone+intravenous injection of flurbiprofen axetil and dexamethasone. In local anesthesia group, local infiltration anesthesia with ropivacaine was adopted. The main outcome measure was the incidence of intraoperative pain numeric rating scale (NRS) score>3 points in the two groups. The secondary observation indicators included NRS score and hemodynamic indexes [mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR)] at various time points during surgery [before anesthesia (T0), at the time of incision (T1), 10 minutes after surgery (T2), during gastric body traction (T3), and at the end of surgery (T4)], incidence of adverse reactions, postoperative patient satisfaction score, as well as the NRS scores at rest and activity (coughing) within 24 hours after surgery. Results: The multimodal analgesia group included 21 males and 4 females, aged (61.4±9.9) years. There were 19 males and 6 females in the local anesthesia group, aged (58.6±10.8) years. The incidence of intraoperative NRS score>3 points and the incidence of salvage analgesia in the multimodal analgesia group were both 12.0% (3/25), which were lower than 60.0% (15/25) in the local anesthesia group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.001); The NRS score [M (Q1, Q3)] at T3 in the multimodal analgesia group was 2 (2, 3) points, which were lower than 5 (3, 6) points in the local anesthesia group (P<0.05). There were smaller variabilities in MAP and HR in the multimodal analgesia group than those in the local anesthesia group (all P<0.05). The incidence of intraoperative tachycardia, surgical traction reaction, and nausea in the multimodal analgesia group was lower than that in the local anesthesia group (all P<0.05). The postoperative satisfaction score of patients in the multimodal analgesia group was (9.25±0.71) points, which were higher than (7.33±0.87) points in the local anesthesia group (P<0.001). NRS score during postoperative activity within 24 hours in the multimodal analgesia group were (2.36±0.75) points, which were lower than (3.03±0.81) points of the local anesthesia group (P=0.005). No adverse reactions such as urinary retention, nausea, vomiting and dizziness occurred in both groups. Conclusion: Compared with local anesthesia, the multimodal analgesic strategy could provide better analgesic effect and longer duration, better hemodynamic stability, and fewer intraoperative adverse reactions in patients with end-stage head and neck cancer undergoing open gastrostomy.

Multimodal analgesia versus traditional opiate based analgesia after cardiac surgery, a randomized controlled trial

Evaluation of the Effect of New Multimodal Analgesia Regimen for Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled, Single-Center Clinical Study

Major in Hospital Complications and Duration of Hospital Stay in a Comparative Study between a Multimodal Analgesia Regimen Versus IV Morphine Analgesia after Open-Cardiac Surgeries

Multimodal Analgesic Effectiveness on Acute Postoperative Pain Management After Adult Cardiac Surgery

Study on Using Multimodal Analgesia in Postoperative Cardiac ICU

Postoperative Multimodal Analgesia in Cardiac Surgery

Intravenous Methadone versus Intrathecal Morphine as Part of an Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery Protocol on Postoperative Pain and Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Intrathecal Morphine for Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

[Application of Multimodal Analgesia in Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Patients: a Prospective Nonrandomized Controlled Study].

[Effectiveness and safety of multimodal analgesia in open gastrostomy in patients with end-stage head and neck cancer]

Preemptive multimodal analgesia for gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy: a randomized controlled trial

Multimodal therapy in perioperative analgesia

Effect of opioid-free versus opioid-based strategies during multimodal anaesthesia on postoperative morphine consumption after bariatric surgery: a randomised double-blind clinical trial

Multimodal Analgesia, Current Concepts, and Acute Pain Considerations

Can Multimodal Analgesia Reduce Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroscopy? A Retrospective Study

Clinical efficacy of multimodal analgesic pain control on the posterior lumbar spine surgery

Multimodal Analgesia in Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

A Novel Multimodal Postoperative Pain Protocol for 1- to 2-Level Open Lumbar Fusions: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Efficacy of Parecoxib Sodium Combined with Epidural Morphine for Multi-Mode Analgesia after Gynecologic Operation: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Prospective Study

Methadone in combination with magnesium, ketamine, lidocaine, and dexmedetomidine improves postoperative outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting: an observational multicentre study

Multimodal Analgesic Approach Incorporating Paravertebral Blocks for Open Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: a Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study