Abstract:Abstract: The effects of asymmetric information are often difficult to detect empirically, such as in insurance settings (Chiappori, Jullien, Salanie and Salanie, 2006). We show that allowing for the possibility of referencedependent preferences can assist with this challenge. Using detailed auto insurance claims data and adopting the methodology of Allen, DeChow, Pope and Wu (2017) which studies reference-dependence in marathon finishing times, we show that policyholders exaggerate their damage claims in a manner consistent with referencedependent moral hazard. Consistent with our theoretical model of reference-dependent claims, we find stronger reference-dependent behavior among policyholders with higher premium levels and low risk policyholders. Also consistent with the model, policyholders are more reference-dependent in their first claims than in subsequent claims, and in the second half of the coverage year compared to the first half. The detected reference point is the amount of the original premium paid in other words, in claiming their accident damages, policyholders seek to claim back the original price of their insurance. We do not find robust patterns in the concentration of insurance claims at round number percentages greater than or less than the full premium amount, such as 90% or 110%, nor at round number nominal amounts. This implies that the unnatural claim behavior is motivated significantly by loss aversion regarding the premium paid rather than merely wanting to increase one’s claims more generally. Since damage claims can only be this precisely manipulated by the policy holder after an accident, the findings can be attributed primarily to ex-post moral hazard but not adverse selection or ex-ante moral hazard. Furthermore, the pattern exists only for individually-held policies but not corporate-held policies, which is consistent with a reference point in individual utility. Our study illustrates the potential of behavioral economics frameworks in assisting with identification challenges for classical economic problems.

The ethics of moral hazard revisited

Moral Hazard in Health Insurance: What We Know and How We Know It

Optimism, overconfidence, and moral hazard

Perilous and unaccountable: The positive relationship between dominance and moral hazard behaviors.

Bank bailouts: Moral hazard and commitment

Disentangling Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection in Private Health Insurance

Exaggerating to Break-Even: Reference-Dependent Moral Hazard in Auto Insurance Claims

Moral Responsibility for Systemic Financial Risk

Moral Hazard with Heterogeneous Beliefs

Moral Hazard, Dynamic Incentives, and Ambiguous Perceptions

Moral Hazard with Network Effects

The current state of cyber insurance and regulation in the context of investment efficiency and moral hazard: A literature review

Moral Hazard Incentives under Formal Insurance and Informal Insurance: Evidence from a Framed Field Experiment

Moral Hazard in Dynamic Risk Management

Moral hazard in welfare economics: on the advantage of Planner's advices to manage employees' actions

Workers' moral hazard and private insurer effort in disability insurance

A Quantitative Model of Dynamic Moral Hazard

The Skin In The Game Heuristic for Protection Against Tail Events

Analyses on Agent's Moral Hazard Factors about Management of Eco-environment

Repoliticizing financial risk

Beware the Black Widow at Claim Time: A Report of Three Cases