The Governance of Standardisation in Turkish Green Building Certification Schemes

Mehmet Cetik
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2435160
2014-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Globally-known green building certification schemes have become dominant in the Turkish market. However, Turkey desires its own national scheme not only to deliver at home but also if possible to sell this label abroad. Three national schemes aim to be “Turkey’s label” while competing against each other as well as global schemes operating in Turkey. The first national scheme is “Green Building Certification System”, governed by an association called “Turkish Green Building Council” (CEDBIK); secondly, “Safe Green Building Certificate” governed by “Turkish Standards Institute” (TSI); and finally, “Sustainable Energy Efficient Buildings-Turkey” (SEEB-TR), a scheme mainly run by a state university. During this competition, what is mostly overlooked is the fact that globally-known green building labels like LEED as well as other well-known voluntary initiatives respect good governance criteria while preparing their standards. They even compete in terms of such criteria to gain more recognition both by the market and public authorities. Similarly, the good governance of those national schemes becomes an essential element for more recognition. As a benchmark, the US Green Building Council (USGBC) – preparing standards for the mostly preferred label, LEED both in Turkey and the world – is analyzed in relation to well-established good governance principles of openness, transparency, participation, consensus, effectiveness and relevance and development dimension. Next, the three national voluntary schemes are analysed and compared to USGBC on the basis of same criteria. To that end, any formal founding or implementing acts of voluntary schemes is surveyed in terms of procedures. Besides, relevant managers and state officials are interviewed on the basis of same set of criteria. Overall, it is found that CEDBIK is the closest scheme to USGBC – though lagging significantly behind USGBC. None of them seems to be capable of beating any competition against LEED and become Turkey’s label.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?