Abstract:Paulo Cruchinho, 1 María Dolores López-Franco, 2 Manuel Luís Capelas, 3 Sofia Almeida, 4 Phillippa May Bennett, 5– 7 Marcelle Miranda da Silva, 1, 8 Gisela Teixeira, 1 Elisabete Nunes, 1 Pedro Lucas, 1 Filomena Gaspar 1 On Behalf of the Handovers4SafeCare 1 Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Center (CIDNUR) of Lisbon, Nursing School of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal; 2 CTS-464 Nursing and Innovation in Healthcare, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain; 3 Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Health Sciences and Nursing, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Lisboa, Portugal; 4 Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Health Sciences and Nursing, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Porto, Portugal; 5 Center for English, Translation, and Anglo-Portuguese Studies (CETAPS), Lisboa, Portugal; 6 Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities of the New University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal; 7 Faculty of Arts and Humanities of the University of Coimbra, Department of Languages, Literatures and Cultures, Coimbra, Portugal; 8 Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Anna Nery Nursing School, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Correspondence: Paulo Cruchinho, Nursing School of Lisbon, Avenida Prof. Egas Moniz, Lisboa, 1600-190, Portugal, Tel +351 217913400, Email Cross-cultural validation of self-reported measurement instruments for research is a long and complex process, which involves specific risks of bias that could affect the research process and results. Furthermore, it requires researchers to have a wide range of technical knowledge about the translation, adaptation and pre-test aspects, their purposes and options, about the different psychometric properties, and the required evidence for their assessment and knowledge about the quantitative data processing and analysis using statistical software. This article aimed: 1) identify all guidelines and recommendations for translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation within the healthcare sciences; 2) describe the methodological approaches established in these guidelines for conducting translation, adaptation, and cross-cultural validation; and 3) provide a practical guideline featuring various methodological options for novice researchers involved in translating, adapting, and validating measurement instruments. Forty-two guidelines on translation, adaptation, or cross-cultural validation of measurement instruments were obtained from "CINAHL with Full Text" (via EBSCO) and "MEDLINE with Full Text". A content analysis was conducted to identify the similarities and differences in the methodological approaches recommended. Bases on these similarities and differences, we proposed an eight-step guideline that includes: a) forward translation; 2) synthesis of translations; 3) back translation; 4) harmonization; 5) pre-testing; 6) field testing; 7) psychometric validation, and 8) analysis of psychometric properties. It is a practical guideline because it provides extensive and comprehensive information on the methodological approaches available to researchers. This is the first methodological literature review carried out in the healthcare sciences regarding the methodological approaches recommended by existing guidelines. Keywords: cross-cultural comparison, decision-making, psychometric properties, research design, validation studies, health services research Healthcare research requires the use of cross-culturally validated instruments to measure implementation of healthcare interventions and their outcomes through quantitative comparisons over time and across organizations. 1–4 The use of data obtained through culturally adapted evaluation instruments allows researchers, policymakers, managers and, health professionals to gain a more analytical view of the phenomena under study and to develop internationally accepted and recognized theories on the provision of patient care, based on the comparison of local data with broader data. 5 This approach also facilitates the identification of factors contributing to the effectiveness of healthcare intervention programs, 6 or other forms of Outcomes Research. This type of quantitative research, focused on the quality of healthcare provision, requires valid and reliable measuring instruments, 7 obtained through cross-cultural validation studies. These studies aim to confirm the capacity of measurement instruments developed in one culture to produce meaningful results when applied in another culture. 8 Measurement instruments can include questionnaires, tests, rating scales and self-reports, 9 the latter being also known as Patient-Reporte -Abstract Truncated-

Cross-cultural translation of quality instruments in the organ donation process

Translation and Validation of the Arrhythmia-Specific Questionnaire in Tachycardia and Arrhythmia (ASTA) to the Brazilian Context: An Instrument Focusing on Arrhythmia Symptoms

Translation and cross cultural adaptation of the questionnaire "Quality of Alimentation" for brazilian portuguese

Cross-Cultural Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Quality of Oncology Nursing Care Scale

Quality of Communication Questionnaire for COPD patients receiving palliative care: translation and cross-cultural adaptation for use in Brazil

Translation and Cross-cultural Adaptation of the SOSG-OQ 2.0 Questionnaire into Brazilian Portuguese

Cross-cultural validation of the Spanish version of the Kidney AlloTransplant Immunosuppressive Therapy Adherence Questionnaire (KATITA-25)

The significance of exploring conceptual equivalence within the process of the cross-cultural adaptation of tools: The case of the Patient's Perception of Feeling Known by their Nurses Scale

Brazilian Portuguese translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the “Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities” (CPCHILD©) questionnaire

Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of Measurement Instruments: A Practical Guideline for Novice Researchers

Translation, Cultural Adaptation of the Portuguese Provider Attitudes toward Cardiac Rehabilitation and Referral (PACRR-P) Scale and Assessment of Its' Measurement Properties

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the MISSCARE Survey-Ped into Brazilian Portuguese

TRANSLATION AND TRANSCULTURAL ADAPTATION OF THE PATIENT MEASURE OF SAFETY (PMOS) QUESTIONNAIRE TO BRAZILIAN PORTUGUESE

Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Communication Assessment Tool for Use in a Simulated Clinical Setting

Transcultural adaptation and psychometric properties of Family Quality of Life Survey for caregivers of people with neurodegenerative disease: a study of Spanish families who live in the rural Spain–Portugal cross-border

Translation and Validation of the Nutrition for Sport Knowledge Questionnaire in Brazil (NSKQ-BR)

Cultural Translation and Validation of the Bariatric Quality of Life Index to European Portuguese

Translation and validation of the techno-stress questionnaire in Brazil

Interventions to Improve the Quality in the Organ and Tissue Donation Process

Translation and cultural adaptation of the King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease health status questionnaire for use in Brazil

Brazilian version of Calgary-Cambridge Observation Guide 28-item version: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties