Abstract:The existence of four directions of psychoanalysis realization in modern psychology is argued in the historical-psychological research, that is as an original method of treatment of neuroses and other mental disorders exclusively in a verbal way; as a theory of personality, that is, as a system of scientific knowledge about the formation of human character; as a systemic, often shocking, critique of Western civilization and as a new philosophy and thus a kind of worldview that sheds the light of truth on the unconscious sphere of its life. The historical way of formation of Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalysis as a separate, biologically determined, naturally centered and culturally influential current of psychological science of the XX century is highlighted and the motivating influence of concepts and themes of B. Pascal, F. Nietzsche and especially J. Charcot is indicated on this formation, firstly as an idea and research program, then as a theory and method of psychotherapeutic practice. The exceptional importance of Freud’s creative collaboration with his older colleague Joseph Brier is emphasized, the productivity of which is confirmed by the jointly published book “The Study of Hysteria” published in 1895. It is it which initiates the expansive psychoanalytic discourse. It is noted that the idea and concept of displacement became the central core of Freudian psychology and made it possible to understand both individual works of fiction and classical works of art. It is stated that translations of selected Freud’s works into the native language were received by Ukrainian scientists only at the end of the last century, which, however, does not diminish the importance of psychoanalysis as a theoretical-empirical foundation of anthropology. Finally, based on the rich legacy of Philip Lersch, a conclusion is formulated about the prospects of a phenomenological approach to the cognition of human mental life in the context of urgent tasks of both theoretical psychology and applied, practice-oriented.

Interpersonal rivalries, gender and the intellectual and scientific making of psychoanalysis in 1940s Britain.

A case for a "middle-way career" in the history of psychology: The work of pioneering psychoanalyst Marjorie Brierley in early 20th century Britain

Donnel B. Stern and Irwin Hirsch (Editors): The Interpersonal Perspective in Psychoanalysis, 1960’s–1990’s: Rethinking Transference and Countertransference; AND Further Developments in Interpersonal Psychoanalysis, 1980’s–2010’s: Evolving Interest in the Analyst’s Subjectivity

Dissenting colleagues; power, alienation, vulnerability

The War on Women in Psychoanalytic Theory Building: Past to Present

In all questions, my interest is not in the individual people but in the analytic movement as a whole. It will be hard enough here in Europe in the times to come to keep it going. After all, we are just a handful of people who really have that in mind

Experimental Psychology and Psychoanalysis: What We Can Learn from a Century of Misunderstanding

The sexual couple: a psychoanalytic exploration

In This Issue, Psychoanalytic Dialogues 34-3

Men of Dreams and Men of Action: Neurologists, Neurosurgeons, and the Performance of Professional Identity, 1920-1950

Anonymity, Neutrality, and Confidentiality in the Actual Methods of Sigmund Freud: A Review of 43 Cases, 1907–1939

Psychoanalysis and politics

Afraid to Commit: Proposing Psychoanalysis and the Paradox of the Analyst's Desire

[The scientific character of psychoanalysis: Freud in the current discussion]

Review of The Interpersonal Perspective in Psychoanalysis, 1960s–1990s: Rethinking Transference and Countertransference and Review of Further Developments in Interpersonal Psychoanalysis, 1980s–2010s: Evolving Interest in the Analyst's Subjectivity

Finding Integration in a Splintered World: Contemporary Psychoanalytic Thoughts on Clinical Work

The Social Determinants of Psychoanalytic Therapy: Fromm's Anti-Authoritarian "Calling Card"

Lost Objects: From the Laboratories of Hypnosis to the Psychoanalytic Setting

Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalysis as the basis of anthropology

Ambivalence and war