Understanding students’ motivation towards proactive career behaviours through goal-setting theory and the job demands–resources model

Andrew James Clements,Caroline Kamau
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1326022
2017-05-16
Studies in Higher Education
Abstract:The graduate labour market is highly competitive but little is known about why students vary in their development of employability. This study contributes to the literature by applying goal-setting theory and the job demands–resources model to investigate how motivational processes influence students’ proactive career behaviours. We tested four hypotheses using structural equation modelling and moderation/mediation analysis using a nested model approach; 432 undergraduates from 21 UK universities participated in this cross-sectional study. The results showed that students higher in mastery approach had greater perceived employability mediated by two proactive career behaviours (skill development and network building). Students’ career goal commitment was associated with all four proactive career behaviours (career planning, skill development, career consultation and network building). Students’ academic and employment workloads did not negatively impact their proactive career behaviours. University tutors and career services should therefore encourage students to set challenging career goals that reflect mastery approach.
education & educational research
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### The Problem the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to explore why there are differences in the development of employability skills among university students when facing the future job market. Specifically, the author applies Goal-Setting Theory and the Job Demands-Resources Model to study how motivational processes influence students' Proactive Career Behaviors. The main objectives of the paper are: 1. **Understanding the Motivational Process**: Explain why some students are more actively engaged in career planning, skill development, career counseling, and networking than others. 2. **Exploring the Impact of Goal Setting**: Analyze the relationship between Self-Efficacy and Mastery Approach, and how these factors influence students' Perceived Employability. 3. **Evaluating the Impact of Workload**: Examine whether academic and employment workloads negatively affect students' proactive career behaviors. ### Main Hypotheses 1. **Hypothesis 1**: Self-Efficacy is positively correlated with Mastery Approach. 2. **Hypothesis 2**: Proactive Career Behaviors mediate the relationship between Mastery Approach and Perceived Employability. 3. **Hypothesis 3**: Goal Commitment moderates the relationship between Mastery Approach and Proactive Career Behaviors. 4. **Hypothesis 4**: Perceived Workload Stress moderates the relationship between Mastery Approach and Proactive Career Behaviors. ### Research Design and Methods - **Sample**: 432 undergraduate students from 21 universities in the UK. - **Measurement Tools**: - Self-Efficacy: Using the New General Self-Efficacy Scale (NGSE). - Mastery Approach: Using the Mastery Approach subscale of the Achievement Goal Questionnaire. - Goal Commitment: Using Klein et al.'s one-dimensional goal commitment scale. - Perceived Workload: Using the Work Pressure subscale of the Job Characteristics Scale. - Proactive Career Behaviors: Using the Proactive Career Behaviors Scale. - Perceived Employability: Using the Perceived Employability Scale. - **Data Analysis**: Hypothesis testing was conducted using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). ### Results - **Hypothesis 1**: Self-Efficacy is significantly positively correlated with Mastery Approach (β=0.57, p<0.001). - **Hypothesis 2**: Skill development and networking fully mediated the relationship between Mastery Approach and Perceived Employability, partially supporting Hypothesis 2. - **Hypothesis 3**: Goal Commitment actually served as a mediator rather than a moderator. - **Hypothesis 4**: Perceived Workload Stress did not significantly moderate the relationship between Mastery Approach and Proactive Career Behaviors. ### Conclusion This study reveals the important role of motivational processes in students' proactive career behaviors through Goal-Setting Theory and the Job Demands-Resources Model. The results indicate that students with higher Self-Efficacy and Mastery Approach are more likely to engage in proactive career behaviors, thereby enhancing their Perceived Employability. Additionally, Goal Commitment served as a mediator in this process rather than a moderator. These findings provide important theoretical and practical guidance for universities and personal mentors in supporting students' employability development.