THE ACCURACY OF PHYLOGENETIC ESTIMATION USING THE NEIGHBOR‐JOINING METHOD

Junhyong Kim,F. James Rohlf,Robert R. Sokal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb02107.x
IF: 4.171
1993-04-01
Evolution
Abstract:We studied the factors affecting the accuracy of the neighbor-joining (NJ) method for estimating phylogenies by simulating character change under different evolutionary models applied to twenty different 8-OTU tree topologies that varied widely with respect to tree imbalance and stemminess. The models incorporated three evolutionary rates-constant, varying among lineages, varying among characters-and three evolutionary contexts concerning patterns of character change relative to speciation events-phyletic, speciational, and punctuational. All combinations of the rate and context models were studied. In addition, three different absolute rates of change were investigated. To measure the accuracy, the strict consensus index was computed between the estimated tree and the tree topology along which the data had been generated. The results were analyzed by analysis of variance and compared to a previous study that evaluated UPGMA clustering and maximum parsimony (MP) as phylogenetic estimation techniques. We found evolutionary context and tree imbalance to be the most important factors affecting the accuracy of the NJ method. NJ was more accurate than UPGMA or MP in terms of the average strict consensus index over all treatments. However, no one method was more accurate than the other two for all combinations of treatments. Higher absolute rate of change generally resulted in higher accuracy for all three methods.
ecology,genetics & heredity,evolutionary biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?